LostinLondon - think that dippingbackin is def W 11+, and I thought that there was a sports scholar too on the last thread.
Dibble, I am always cautious about league tables I'm afraid because they measure a snapshot of one aspect. Wilsons for example is up to 180 boys this year (and from this point on). One of the reasons that the head wanted to add a class of girls was so that he would get the top 30 girls in the area rather than the boys ranked 151-180. It will have a slight pull on the stats (and the cynical side of me says that he would be easily able to claim to be the top co-ed in the country, but perhaps I have seen too much school marketing). If you were only looking at the results of say the top 100 boys at each of the schools there would be a different comparison. But equally how cut-throat do we want the schools to get? Some of these boys are dealing with physical and mental illnesses common in the teenage years, some will be dealing with bereavement etc... Newstead Woods tumbled down the league tables by some ridiculous amount just because 1 girl got a D in maths. I really don't think that that means that the school is suddenly a poor one, though on the face of it it has gone from a top 10 to a top 150 school in a year....
DC traditionally don't negotiate on their scholarships to the best of my knowledge, which is a shame as you obv have a bright boy. I guess if you can afford it and DC is the most local school, then it must be tempting.