Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we can't afford the triple lock

535 replies

paddleboardingmum · Today 08:47

Things seem very weighted against young people right now in terms of tax, student loans, and then there's the cost of mortgages and childcare. I know there are some older people struggling and I do feel sorry for them. But plenty are not and I think we just can't afford the triple lock at the moment. AIBU

OP posts:
EasternStandard · Today 12:01

Idontpostmuch · Today 11:58

All those uneducated people who don't know the difference between 'too' and 'to'? Sorry, couldn't resist that 😂. Obviously just a typo. Brexit should never have gone ahead. Referendums (referenda? - sorry, uneducated 😄) are merely advisory, and the result isn't binding. Yet the Government allowed the country to be derailed by people who didn't understand what they were voting for. Even if everyone who voted leave were to have a change of heart it wouldn't help. A country can't just rejoin the EU, sadly.

Plus is it really the answer, various EU countries are struggling with the same issues.

Badbadbunny · Today 12:02

ToCatchACat · Today 11:51

Good idea. Let's get employers paying an actual living wage so that people working full time don't need to be topped up by UC to pay for basics.

Thats what you mean, yes?

Which would cause increased prices, taxes and inflation so we'd end up no better off.

Idontpostmuch · Today 12:03

EasternStandard · Today 12:01

Plus is it really the answer, various EU countries are struggling with the same issues.

It would never be a cure-all but still better in than out.

Differentforgirls · Today 12:03

Kotyss · Today 11:52

And no private pension to live off?

Loads didn't have it. We can't break the promise they would get a state one.

Badbadbunny · Today 12:04

limequeen · Today 11:51

People choosing not to have children is precisely the reason we can't afford the triple lock. It is only affordable in a world where we continually have enough people working and paying tax to cover the cost of the pensions. With the rapidly decreasing fertility rate we cant afford a benefit that will perpetually increase more than inflation. It will bankrupt is at some point so the question is when does it get scrapped not should we. IMO it should be linked to the average increase in wages so that everyone has a vested interest in ensuring policies that benefit those who are working.

Yup, nailed it. Should be linked to average wage increases. When it was first introduced, there was a need to drag up the state pension to a more realistic level, but we've done that, so we need it just to keep pace with wage increases, no more, no less.

paddleboardingmum · Today 12:04

A "let's scupper pensions" post on Mumsnet is almost as fucking lazy as a "my MiL's a bitch" posts. Low hanging fruit that attracts ageists.

It's not about scuppering pensions. The point is, the triple lock should be scrapped and pensions only increased in line with wages, for example.

There are still people alive who fought & lived through World War 2.
Plus the difficult years that followed of rationing & rebuilding
Have some respect for your elders

I'd say respect is a two-way street. Anyhow the WW2 generation are dying out. I would be all for more benefits for that generation say the over 85s, to recognise their special contribution. State pensioners today were born in the 50s and 60s and weren't involved in WW2.

It's clear from this thread that plenty of pensioners accept they are doing okay in relation to everyone else. I know pensioners like this who say they and their friends are relatively well off and don't need free bus passes and prescriptions.

OP posts:
Differentforgirls · Today 12:05

ifonly4 · Today 11:45

The amount quoted this morning, will work out as a 5% rise to my Mum's pension. Obviously I'm happy for her and others, but how many others will be getting a 5% pay rise on benefits and particular those that are working and currently funding the system.

I totally understand most have paid into the system and should now take from it, but how many really need that amount on retirement. We've both taken early retirement, living on DH's work pension of £2,100 - we pay the bills, go away, to to the pub for lunch, do gym/exercise classes. We stopped paying into mine when DD was little as money was very tight, so my pension is minimal - and I think we'll use it for fun, household emergenices (got house together in last five years as money became available, so only things that could be expensive in next few years are flooring and boiler), maybe replacing car later on (just done that). When we both get our old age pension, we'll be really well off and our government pension will be excess.

You need to apply for it. You could always decide not to?

CoventryCity · Today 12:05

LarryForPrimeMinister · Today 08:49

Considering the birth rate has dropped significantly, definitely not. Feel sorry for pensioners who don't have private pensions to rely on but its just not going to work.

So what exactly do you think the pensioners who have no money and no private pension, no property to sell, no way of working as too old /frail - should do exactly?

Yetone · Today 12:06

Badbadbunny · Today 11:39

Indeed, but pensioners are also benefitting from the additional savings allowance of £5k covering interest etc. Well, in reality, everyone "could" benefit from it with the right income profile/level, but it's mostly pensioners who benefit, because it's only available to those with total income under £18k or so, and for whom £5k of that is interest, so an income of £12k pension and £6k of interest, total income, £18k, no income tax to pay. Compare with a worker on wage of £18k who pays income tax on £6k of that. Just another way in which pensioners (who are the most common beneficiary) get a tax break that workers don't.

It is not just pensioners who have income split on savings/ salary like this. Many part time workers will have the same savings. Most savvy pensioners will have put their money into ISAs so when they draw down from them, they won’t pay any tax anyway.
@Badbadbunny
You seem to be intent on blaming pensioners for all the wrongs of the world and just assume it was so much better years ago. I have some sympathy, because I think some youngsters have it pretty tough now but it wasn’t a bed of roses when we were younger either.

Everanewbie · Today 12:07

Viviennemary · Today 11:47

Cut the foreign aid. Stop giving out so much in benefits. Leave the old folk alone.

What do you mean, leave the old folk alone? Do you really mean forever preserve the rate best of all worlds rate of increase, compounding and compounding? You make it sound like an over 67 year old tax surcharge is being proposed.

DontSingSusan · Today 12:07

AncientOlivetree · Today 11:57

There are still people alive who fought & lived through World War 2.
Plus the difficult years that followed of rationing & rebuilding

Have some respect for your elders

I am all for pension increases

There are only 8,000 WW2 veterans still alive in the UK (of13 million pensioners).

But this is not the point. It's not about respecting elders or not. It's about being massively indebted and continuing to give more money (funded by borrowing) to the (on average) wealthiest section of society.

Differentforgirls · Today 12:08

DontSingSusan · Today 11:52

The Triple Lock!

It doesnt. State pension is £12548 so where does the extra come from?

CoventryCity · Today 12:08

DontSingSusan · Today 12:07

There are only 8,000 WW2 veterans still alive in the UK (of13 million pensioners).

But this is not the point. It's not about respecting elders or not. It's about being massively indebted and continuing to give more money (funded by borrowing) to the (on average) wealthiest section of society.

Edited

So what exactly do you think the pensioners who have no money and no private pension, no property to sell, no way of working as too old /frail - should do exactly?

Woodfiresareamazing2 · Today 12:08

I've already had to wait another 6 years for the pension I signed up to get at 60.

That's roughly £55,000 I have missed out on.

I'm not going to welcome any further cuts...

Idontpostmuch · Today 12:09

paddleboardingmum · Today 12:04

A "let's scupper pensions" post on Mumsnet is almost as fucking lazy as a "my MiL's a bitch" posts. Low hanging fruit that attracts ageists.

It's not about scuppering pensions. The point is, the triple lock should be scrapped and pensions only increased in line with wages, for example.

There are still people alive who fought & lived through World War 2.
Plus the difficult years that followed of rationing & rebuilding
Have some respect for your elders

I'd say respect is a two-way street. Anyhow the WW2 generation are dying out. I would be all for more benefits for that generation say the over 85s, to recognise their special contribution. State pensioners today were born in the 50s and 60s and weren't involved in WW2.

It's clear from this thread that plenty of pensioners accept they are doing okay in relation to everyone else. I know pensioners like this who say they and their friends are relatively well off and don't need free bus passes and prescriptions.

No, those born in the 60s are not yet pensioners. Those born in 1960 will be eligible for state pension next year. Those born in 1969 will have a further 9 years to wait.

MauveFatball · Today 12:10

Meadowfinch · Today 09:36

Those who contributed with NI are those who have worked all their lives and are, in the most part, those who have managed to accumulate a nest egg or private pension. Most people have paid NI.

Those who have not paid NI are mums who stayed at home and those who are not legally employed for whatever reason. They are generally the ones who have neither NI contributions nor a private pension or nestegg. Do you expect them to starve on the streets?

A good place to start would be to require 40 NI contributing years for a full pension, rather than 35. People generally start work at 16, 18 or 21 so all are capable of putting in 40 years NI.

I’m a ‘WASPI’ woman, got my state pension finally nearly 3 years ago, and actually had 50 years of contributions (and quite a few years where there were my 52 weeks of contributions AND 52 weeks of credits because I was in receipt of child benefit whilst also working full time). Many of my same age friends are in the same situation, all had over 40 years worth before getting their state pension.
I also have a work pension (but when I started work in a bank at age 16 I wasn’t allowed to join their pension scheme as I was a female! Males the same age did! So had a good few years head start on me.) and I pay tax.

MiceSpiders · Today 12:11

Chaarlene · Today 08:52

Whenever I read stuff like this on here (you forgot to mention 'boomers' in your post, btw) I like to draw attention to the seminal and inspiring lyrics by Mike and The Mechanics....

Every generation
Blames the one before

True dat.

What a track

BlankSheetOrKnownQuantity · Today 12:12

Badbadbunny · Today 12:04

Yup, nailed it. Should be linked to average wage increases. When it was first introduced, there was a need to drag up the state pension to a more realistic level, but we've done that, so we need it just to keep pace with wage increases, no more, no less.

Totally agree

Unphased · Today 12:13

Idontpostmuch · Today 12:03

It would never be a cure-all but still better in than out.

In what way?

DontSingSusan · Today 12:13

CoventryCity · Today 12:08

So what exactly do you think the pensioners who have no money and no private pension, no property to sell, no way of working as too old /frail - should do exactly?

Claim pension credit and other benefits they are entitled to.

Kotyss · Today 12:15

Differentforgirls · Today 12:03

Loads didn't have it. We can't break the promise they would get a state one.

I mean. They should get something as they've paid in with NI. Perhaps a lump sum, but this Ponzi scheme can't last forever can it.

nearlylovemyusername · Today 12:16

DontSingSusan · Today 12:07

There are only 8,000 WW2 veterans still alive in the UK (of13 million pensioners).

But this is not the point. It's not about respecting elders or not. It's about being massively indebted and continuing to give more money (funded by borrowing) to the (on average) wealthiest section of society.

Edited

are they the wealthiest though?

Why don't we start with 8mn benefits recipients? only approx 35% of them are in any form of employment. Any means even a couple of hours a week.

Why don't we start with cash in hands traders who are also very likely to not declare their income and claim benefits.

Do you really believe that 12.5-13k pa is sufficient amount to live on? why NMW is twice more than?

Idontpostmuch · Today 12:17

Unphased · Today 12:13

In what way?

This has all been rehashed countless times. I'm a remainer but I'm not going to go through all the reasons why on a thread that isn't even about Brexit.

peakyblenders · Today 12:17

mumumental · Today 08:51

Here we go. Every time. Tax the billionaires who are trying to influence our politics and leave pensioners the fuck alone.

This 1000%. I'm sick and tired of everyone wanting the most vulnerable in society to suffer. Society is not only comprised of the young.

Idontpostmuch · Today 12:18

DontSingSusan · Today 12:13

Claim pension credit and other benefits they are entitled to.

But the benefit system is broken.