Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

BBQ party tonight

409 replies

Grumpynan · 15/08/2026 08:29

We have planned a family get together this evening with a charcoal bbq in the garden. I hasten to add it’s a proper one not disposable.

should we still go ahead, or should I play save and cook the food indoors, what’s everyone else doing,

I mean, it stresses disposable bbq, says nothing about kettle ones in a garden. But I don’t want to cause any problems, and tbh we have a lot of trees around us and I’m a little worried, DH says I’m being silly but ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
NotMajorTom · 15/08/2026 14:32

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 14:30

Exactly risk mitigation- the bbq is protected from the wind and is on a patio in a garden away from flammable substances with a hose nearby. That’s risk mitigation. You’ve made reasonable endeavours to reduce the risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable. Speaking as someone in the risk industry.

So if you know about risks and mitigation, how do you see the balance of impact vs benefit here.

the likelihood of causing a fire is heightened, and the impact of a fire would be huge.

the benefit of having a bbq vs cooking indoors is small.

if I were in charge of risk, and I think if you were too, you’d make the call not to take the risk here.

this is an avoidable risk with low impact of avoidance and high impact of the worst happens.

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 14:35

NotMajorTom · 15/08/2026 14:32

So if you know about risks and mitigation, how do you see the balance of impact vs benefit here.

the likelihood of causing a fire is heightened, and the impact of a fire would be huge.

the benefit of having a bbq vs cooking indoors is small.

if I were in charge of risk, and I think if you were too, you’d make the call not to take the risk here.

this is an avoidable risk with low impact of avoidance and high impact of the worst happens.

Edited

Yes the likelihood is heightened vs the base level, but is still negligible for a bbq in garden with all the mitigations in place as described. Just because the risk is higher doesn’t mean it is high. It is well documented that people are fundamentally terrible at quantifying risk, as you and many others have demonstrated on this thread. One txt message from the gov and you and everyone’s perception of the risk has changed hugely, yet the risk is no greater today than is was yesterday for example or will be tomorrow.
I am I charge of risk in my house and garden
and as already stated i used my outdoor kitchen this morning and will continue to use it.

mixedpeel · 15/08/2026 14:37

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 12:22

The usual illogical argument.
why go hill walking? You are putting yourself at risk and just putting strain on Mountain Rescue, who are volunteers.
Why go to the beach and swimming in the sea? You are just putting yourself at risk and putting strain on the Coast Guard and RNLI,
who are volunteers.
If you want to avoid increasing risk to all and sundry you should stay home with the lights off and never partake in any activity ever. Every single activity carries risk. You actively engage in the ones that carry the most
risk all the time without thinking eg driving. Yet a low risk activity such as a bbq on a patio at home suddenly becomes cardinal sin all because the government sends a txt message. Critical thinking gone out the window.

It is your critical thinking skills which are lacking. You use the example of hillwalking. In poor weather conditions it is indeed more dangerous to do this, and therefore mountain rescue teams do ask people not to do so.

In any risk assessment you look at both the likelihood of the bad thing happening and the severity of the consequences if it does. It is the second part which is currently hugely higher than would usually be the case for a BBQ in the garden. Vegetation is tinder dry, so any fire which did start would be harder to put out and more likely to spread to other properties, and should anyone need the Fire Service (who do go out to garden BBQ fires every year, btw) they are much less likely to be available.

Mrcollinswave · 15/08/2026 14:37

HoraceCope · 15/08/2026 08:58

you will upset the neighbours
you will get indigestion
cook indoors
you can still eat out doors

I agree she probably shouldn't use the bbq this weekend, due to not being able to relax and potentially upsetting the neighbours, but why would she get indigestion? I've never had indigestion from a bbq and will definitely be using mine again once this heatwave and wildfire risk is over! I'll be doing it in the pouring rain! 😆

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 14:39

mixedpeel · 15/08/2026 14:37

It is your critical thinking skills which are lacking. You use the example of hillwalking. In poor weather conditions it is indeed more dangerous to do this, and therefore mountain rescue teams do ask people not to do so.

In any risk assessment you look at both the likelihood of the bad thing happening and the severity of the consequences if it does. It is the second part which is currently hugely higher than would usually be the case for a BBQ in the garden. Vegetation is tinder dry, so any fire which did start would be harder to put out and more likely to spread to other properties, and should anyone need the Fire Service (who do go out to garden BBQ fires every year, btw) they are much less likely to be available.

As per my response to the previous poster, the likelihood, in your garden, with all the mitigations in place is still extremely low therefore the risk is negligible.

Shmee1988 · 15/08/2026 14:39

Rpop · 15/08/2026 11:35

I just don’t trust the BBQ brigade to all act totally sensibly. En masse, if 10,000 people have garden bbqs at the moment, something somewhere could go badly wrong. As a collective, I think we have a duty of care to one another just to not bother having a bbq. I’m cancelling the one I was going to have tonight (even though it’s a large closed bbq and my husband always stays with it 100% of the time and we would have buckets of water and it’s even near our hose, and we’re really responsible people). However, as a collective we all need to pull together. Missing a burger is hardly a sacrifice. There was a lot of selfish behaviour in Covid which was theoretically ok, but common sense suggested the perpetrator was just a tad selfish.

Yes, but if 10,000 people have a bbq at any time something could go wrong. Its about being sensible.

NotMajorTom · 15/08/2026 14:41

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 14:35

Yes the likelihood is heightened vs the base level, but is still negligible for a bbq in garden with all the mitigations in place as described. Just because the risk is higher doesn’t mean it is high. It is well documented that people are fundamentally terrible at quantifying risk, as you and many others have demonstrated on this thread. One txt message from the gov and you and everyone’s perception of the risk has changed hugely, yet the risk is no greater today than is was yesterday for example or will be tomorrow.
I am I charge of risk in my house and garden
and as already stated i used my outdoor kitchen this morning and will continue to use it.

Edited

So I have to disagree
yes the risk is the same as yesterday or the day before. Heightened. I wouldn’t bbq then. Like I wouldn’t now.

id always weigh up the cost of avoiding vs the impact. In this case it’s low cost to avoid a low (ish) but heightened risk with catastrophic impact. I guess I don’t understand why anyone would weight that up and take that chance right now unless they don’t understand or don’t care

Rpop · 15/08/2026 14:55

Shmee1988 · 15/08/2026 14:39

Yes, but if 10,000 people have a bbq at any time something could go wrong. Its about being sensible.

Yes but now it’s elevated risk with the tinderbox gardens. And the stretched fire crews.

SinisterGreenMan · 15/08/2026 14:58

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 14:30

Exactly risk mitigation- the bbq is protected from the wind and is on a patio in a garden away from flammable substances with a hose nearby. That’s risk mitigation. You’ve made reasonable endeavours to reduce the risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable. Speaking as someone in the risk industry.

You’ve made reasonable endeavours to reduce the risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable.

We are talking about (non-essential) barbecues.

No one has to have a barbecue so a "reasonable endeavour(s) to reduce the risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable" means reducing risk to "no risk at all" simply by leaving the barbecue in the shed/garage and cooking your sausages indoors.

Don't light unnecessary fires when half the country is ablaze.

Surely any fool can work that one out whether they are someone from the risk industry, or someone who isn't a complete moron.

sittingonabeach · 15/08/2026 14:59

Maybe the risk of having a BBQ hadn’t changed but the risk of emergency services being available has changed.

Maddy70 · 15/08/2026 15:06

It's disposable BBQs I'm question as they are too close to the ground and then hot coals get dumped into bins .
A proper BBQ isn't dangerous and isn't what they are asking you to refrain from

SinisterGreenMan · 15/08/2026 15:26

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 14:39

As per my response to the previous poster, the likelihood, in your garden, with all the mitigations in place is still extremely low therefore the risk is negligible.

Why aim for "negligible risk" when "no risk" is so easily achievable?

Do you have any understanding of how serious the situation is? Do you realise that people are frightened for a very good reason? That your barbecue - however "negligible" the risk it poses still has the potential to devastate lives?

People are losing their homes, their animals and their livelihoods. The damage to the countryside and wildlife is devastating. Over the last few weeks the air outside our home has frequently been filled with the smell of smoke from fires in our area, some of them 50 miles and more away and several in the immediate area where I live.

My brother is a fire officer and the horrendous conditions he and his colleagues have been working in and the things they have seen are unimaginable to anyone hasn't been there.

Thankfully, it looks like most people aren't selfish enough to take unnecessary risks because "my barbecue is only a little bit risky".

I hope you have absolutely no responsibility for public safety or risk assessment/mitigation, because your selfish attitude is a disgrace.

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 16:04

SinisterGreenMan · 15/08/2026 14:58

You’ve made reasonable endeavours to reduce the risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable.

We are talking about (non-essential) barbecues.

No one has to have a barbecue so a "reasonable endeavour(s) to reduce the risk to a level as low as reasonably practicable" means reducing risk to "no risk at all" simply by leaving the barbecue in the shed/garage and cooking your sausages indoors.

Don't light unnecessary fires when half the country is ablaze.

Surely any fool can work that one out whether they are someone from the risk industry, or someone who isn't a complete moron.

Says the person who thinks “half the country is ablaze”. It very clearly isn’t. Calm yourself down and get some perspective.

SinisterGreenMan · 15/08/2026 16:33

Sherararara · 15/08/2026 16:04

Says the person who thinks “half the country is ablaze”. It very clearly isn’t. Calm yourself down and get some perspective.

Edited

Some perspective? Are you serious?

Surely someone "in the risk business" can't be oblivious to the devastation being caused by these fires. If you are, you need to turn your television on, look at online news, read a fucking newspaper.

Perhaps you live somewhere that isn't affected. If so, lucky you. You won't have had the experience of watching the mountain you live on in flames, wondering if and when it will get to you. Seeing the residents in the village a mile away from you being evacuated from their homes. Choking on the thick smoke and having to stay indoors with the windows closed in 30°c temperatures. If you had, you might have a better understanding of what other people are going through. That is my "perspective" and that of my neighbours.

Don't underestimate how this is affecting many communities in the UK. Not just the ones directly affected, but the ones miles from the fires who are are affected by the smoke.

You need to hope that it's not your area next, because if enough people like you think a barbecue sausage is worth the risk "negligible" or otherwise you might not stay lucky.

sittingonabeach · 15/08/2026 16:37

Can’t imagine there are many firefighters sitting on their arses. If there’s nothing going on in their area I’m sure many of them are being drafted to other areas

Bigtom · 15/08/2026 16:42

BakedPotatoBeansCheeseColeslaw · 15/08/2026 09:04

This reminds me of Covid when people were looking for reasons to get away with doing things they knew were wrong based on a technicality. Don’t have the bbq op - cook the food indoors.

This reminds me of Covid when people made up rules that didn’t exist Wink

NotMajorTom · 15/08/2026 16:43

Bigtom · 15/08/2026 16:42

This reminds me of Covid when people made up rules that didn’t exist Wink

I don’t see anyone making up rules

i I see people saying you’d be a selfish idiot to do this thing, whether it’s permitted or not.

Headinthecloudsfeetontheground · 15/08/2026 16:45

SinisterGreenMan · 15/08/2026 15:26

Why aim for "negligible risk" when "no risk" is so easily achievable?

Do you have any understanding of how serious the situation is? Do you realise that people are frightened for a very good reason? That your barbecue - however "negligible" the risk it poses still has the potential to devastate lives?

People are losing their homes, their animals and their livelihoods. The damage to the countryside and wildlife is devastating. Over the last few weeks the air outside our home has frequently been filled with the smell of smoke from fires in our area, some of them 50 miles and more away and several in the immediate area where I live.

My brother is a fire officer and the horrendous conditions he and his colleagues have been working in and the things they have seen are unimaginable to anyone hasn't been there.

Thankfully, it looks like most people aren't selfish enough to take unnecessary risks because "my barbecue is only a little bit risky".

I hope you have absolutely no responsibility for public safety or risk assessment/mitigation, because your selfish attitude is a disgrace.

Well said!

KiwiFall · 15/08/2026 17:05

It wouldn’t sit right with me. It would feel like two fingers up at all the fire fighters who have been working tirelessly recently in our area. They must feel like it’s a loosing battle (theres been various arsons in our town). They risk their lives and I’m sure they have had annual leave cancelled too.

sittingonabeach · 15/08/2026 17:13

KiwiFall · 15/08/2026 17:05

It wouldn’t sit right with me. It would feel like two fingers up at all the fire fighters who have been working tirelessly recently in our area. They must feel like it’s a loosing battle (theres been various arsons in our town). They risk their lives and I’m sure they have had annual leave cancelled too.

That’s how I feel. Doesn’t matter whether you don’t trust the Government, disagree whether the alert should have been sent as not an emergency, BBQs aren’t that risky etc, there are many firefighters out there having an horrendous time trying to save people, homes livelihoods, animals etc and if that means fewer BBQs in the next few weeks it’s the least most of us could do. It’s not a big deal for us but it could be a big deal for them

mixedpeel · 15/08/2026 17:31

KiwiFall · 15/08/2026 17:05

It wouldn’t sit right with me. It would feel like two fingers up at all the fire fighters who have been working tirelessly recently in our area. They must feel like it’s a loosing battle (theres been various arsons in our town). They risk their lives and I’m sure they have had annual leave cancelled too.

Indeed. It was the Fire and Rescue Services that asked the government to send the alert out, and with very good reason.

hoptart · 15/08/2026 17:50

Rpop · 15/08/2026 14:17

Actually, an Australian on another thread said they have non-fire days when they are not allowed to bbq. Also they have vegetation which thrives in this weather and doesn’t turn to straw.

They said charcoal BBQs are banned on total fire ban days. Gas BBQs are still permitted, precisely because they pose a negligible risk.

hoptart · 15/08/2026 17:59

sittingonabeach · 15/08/2026 17:13

That’s how I feel. Doesn’t matter whether you don’t trust the Government, disagree whether the alert should have been sent as not an emergency, BBQs aren’t that risky etc, there are many firefighters out there having an horrendous time trying to save people, homes livelihoods, animals etc and if that means fewer BBQs in the next few weeks it’s the least most of us could do. It’s not a big deal for us but it could be a big deal for them

By all means if you don’t want to use your BBQ then don’t, but don’t pretend you’re helping out firefighters. The vast, vast majority of wildfires are started deliberately or by discarded cigarette butts and in some cases disposable BBQs. For house fires, the most common causes are actually indoor cooking equipment (unattended stoves) and faulty wiring. So all the self righteous people saying they will cook inside this weekend to do their bit are actually statistically more likely to start a fire unless you’re going for cold salads only 🤷🏼‍♀️

Thisismyfinesthour · 15/08/2026 18:00

Ahhhwhattodo · 15/08/2026 13:37

Well on that note everyone, just to be on the safe side I’ll not be using my gas hob until further notice. I’ve unplugged the toaster too. Sandwiches all round!

Can nobody use any sensible logic anymore? Disposable BBQs in wild woodlands - bad. Normal BBQ on your patio is NOT what they are warning us about. If you’re lighting it on scorched grass then yes use your brain.

You're not funny, just making yourself sound daft.

Thisismyfinesthour · 15/08/2026 18:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.