Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Colleague has called in sick when they definitely aren’t!

145 replies

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:25

My colleague has been on a fixed term contract with a plan to go into another job at the end of it. They’re not exactly the best employee at the best of times.

They got rejected from that position and asked our boss yesterday if they could stay. The boss said no.

So they just walked out. They’re not in today and to be honest I’d be surprised if we see them again. I’ve already picked up the work of one colleague who has left. Now I’m picking up this work too. AIBU to be totally peed off and fed up?!

OP posts:
Backedoffhackedoff · 30/07/2026 16:43

Why would you take their work on?

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:45

Backedoffhackedoff · 30/07/2026 16:43

Why would you take their work on?

Because there is literally no other option. It’s not like things can just go away, there are very tight deadlines and things that must be done every week. There’s no other option.

OP posts:
34feeling54 · 30/07/2026 16:45

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:33

That the work needs to be done. Because it does.

But you can only do what you can get done in your time at work. So what does it matter?

Backedoffhackedoff · 30/07/2026 16:45

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:45

Because there is literally no other option. It’s not like things can just go away, there are very tight deadlines and things that must be done every week. There’s no other option.

Why doesn’t your boss do it?

Jennyginger · 30/07/2026 16:45

Merkins · 30/07/2026 16:40

You’re not in the CS are you? If you were then you’d know that ‘the boss’ has no say on if and when they get a post filled. They can’t direct recruitment, so we are made to plug gaps in resource for years. There’s currently a recruitment freeze in my department, so pretty much no one who’s left has been replaced since August last year.

We’re very grateful to the media and public who have erroneously banged on about us being underworked and over resourced for so long that the govt has decided to cut posts to the bone and deal with the consequences later. We are extremely fucked.

Ok, but then surely you just do what you can do and anything else just doesn’t get done. Eventually someone important will be inconvenienced and make a fuss.

YoQuieroVino · 30/07/2026 16:45

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:43

Their contract isn’t due to end for another six weeks.

To be honest, they can’t be surprised. They’ve spent the entire last year talking about how much they hate the job, more time away from their desk than at it, and continually made mistakes. If they weren’t on fixed term they would’ve been sacked!

Then surely you’re not surprised that they’ve decided not to come in, can you? Sounds like they weren’t doing much work anyway, so there won’t be too much extra to take over from them if they don’t come back.

yetnothername · 30/07/2026 16:46

Jennyginger · 30/07/2026 16:33

I don’t understand what you mean. What is the boss's "stance"? I find it hard to believe that they think one person can do all the work three people were previously hired for.

You've never worked in the public sector have you? I worked in a public sector in a public-facing office where recruitment was "on hold for two years" but the work didn't stop.

There should have been at least six permanent staff but there was only two and a bit (I was part-time).

In those two years there were lengthy periods when no-one else turned in for work except me due to stress.

It was only when I took went off sick with stress that expensive agency staff were employed. It was another year before permanent staff were recruited by which time I couldn't work there any longer for my own sanity and I left.

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:47

Jennyginger · 30/07/2026 16:45

Ok, but then surely you just do what you can do and anything else just doesn’t get done. Eventually someone important will be inconvenienced and make a fuss.

No. Have you ever worked in healthcare? There is literally no option other than to get it done.

OP posts:
lastapache · 30/07/2026 16:47

Is it reasonable for someone to leave a contract job with no notice, and not take into account the consequences on their colleagues, in circumstances where they've been told they are not being kept on? Yeah, i'd say reasonable enough. They won't get a great reference but maybe they don't care.

You're not their friend, you're just someone they worked with for a few months. Life's too short to be working somewhere you don't want to be for fear of offending a co-worker who - let's face - doesn't even like you.

Succession planning is your boss' job, not your co-worker.

I get that the job still needs to be done. But there is always emergency measures that can be taken when their are unforeseen issues with resources. What if you broke your leg tomorrow? Your boss isn't going to do the work of four people. Someone would be pulled from another area or department, temporarily. Your boss isn't doing that because they know that despite your grumbling you'll work overtime (probably unpaid) to fill the gap.

Get some boundaries. Go to your boss and say it is not possible for you to do X, Y and Z, you are already at breaking point. Tell them that you'll do X, and half of Y, and they'll need to get someone in to do the rest. If not, you can see no other option but to go to your GP and get signed off for mental health reasons, and then they'll need two extra people.

YoQuieroVino · 30/07/2026 16:47

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:45

Because there is literally no other option. It’s not like things can just go away, there are very tight deadlines and things that must be done every week. There’s no other option.

But you said they barely do any work and make loads of mistakes anyway, so will her not being there make much difference?
And there is an option to the work being done… the work not being done. If you all martyr yourselves and take on the extra work, those responsible for allocating resource won’t think there’s a problem.

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:47

Backedoffhackedoff · 30/07/2026 16:45

Why doesn’t your boss do it?

They’re already overstretched!

OP posts:
RumNotRun · 30/07/2026 16:47

I agree @Merkins and then we get criticised for things not being done on time etc. Luckily my director is very good at persuading HR and the senior CS that we have to have more staff but for a few years we have had a massive backlog and are all doing our best to plough through it and get things on track. I can genuinely say that there is no one in my small org that doesn't pull their weight but years of underfunding has had a profound effect. I've worked in other departments, and the private sector, where there are lazy incompetent staff as well as the classic "too many chiefs", but this org is fantastic.

Anyway OP, sorry to derail, but total sympathy to you. All I can suggest is going to your boss, and perhaps including their boss on the email, and lay out what you can do and what you cannot fit into your day. Ask for their priorities, and whether there is any chance for recruitment coming up.

YoQuieroVino · 30/07/2026 16:48

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:47

No. Have you ever worked in healthcare? There is literally no option other than to get it done.

When though? If you’re working 40 hours a week and an extra 40 hours a week of work now needs to be done, will you start working 80 hours a week?

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:49

YoQuieroVino · 30/07/2026 16:48

When though? If you’re working 40 hours a week and an extra 40 hours a week of work now needs to be done, will you start working 80 hours a week?

The golden question. Things get sloppy, mistakes get made and managers get angry but nothing changes because there isn’t the money to bring in anyone else.

OP posts:
Merkins · 30/07/2026 16:53

Jennyginger · 30/07/2026 16:45

Ok, but then surely you just do what you can do and anything else just doesn’t get done. Eventually someone important will be inconvenienced and make a fuss.

That’s not how it works, I’m afraid. They won’t suddenly find the budget for more staff just because important things aren’t being done. They will keep pushing the remaining staff until they go off sick, and then say, “I wonder why we can’t retain staff? It’s a mystery’. Then they’ll spend £M they don’t have on temp contractors in their panic to get the place back on track.

Jennyginger · 30/07/2026 16:54

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:47

No. Have you ever worked in healthcare? There is literally no option other than to get it done.

I understand, I really do, what it feels like to be so tired and overworked that everything gets on top of you and you feel like there’s no way out.

But if you manage, in normal working hours, to get done what used to take three people to do, you’re just confirming the opinion of The powers-that-be that the department was overstaffed before and it’s not necessary to have three staff to do the work.

HelpMeGetThrough · 30/07/2026 16:55

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:30

My boss isn’t going to change their stance. We’re public sector. The work level is the same no matter how many people are in the office. I’m pissed off at the colleague because they know this is what happens, and they only think of themselves!

I don’t blame them for thinking of themselves. I’m only at work for me because they pay me, I certainly don’t worry about anyone else there.

YoQuieroVino · 30/07/2026 16:56

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:49

The golden question. Things get sloppy, mistakes get made and managers get angry but nothing changes because there isn’t the money to bring in anyone else.

You said she was sloppy and made mistakes anyway, and was barely at her desk, so maybe things won’t change as much as you think. It might even be easier now she’s gone as she was so bad at her job.

Cantwaitforwinter · 30/07/2026 16:58

YABU. Firstly you have no idea if your colleagues is unwell or not and no right to question it. You are not a manager.

Secondly if you’re already covering one person’s work, you have every right to refuse to cover a 3rds.

Imaginingdragonsagain · 30/07/2026 16:58

YoQuieroVino · 30/07/2026 16:38

Realistically though, why would they have any loyalty to the company?

Agree with this. Stop struggling on, if you’re managing what incentive do they have to get more staff.

eskimoomikse · 30/07/2026 16:59

I work for a service that is hugely backlogged.

I don't concern myself with that. Nor do I overwork.

I do what I can in the time available; and I treat each service-user with consideration, allowing them the time that they need.

And if the backlog grows, my managers can deal with that - or not

Swiftie1878 · 30/07/2026 17:00

peedoffandtired · 30/07/2026 16:43

Their contract isn’t due to end for another six weeks.

To be honest, they can’t be surprised. They’ve spent the entire last year talking about how much they hate the job, more time away from their desk than at it, and continually made mistakes. If they weren’t on fixed term they would’ve been sacked!

They should have been sacked anyway!

Yet more waste of taxpayer money… 🤷‍♀️

Crunchymum · 30/07/2026 17:01

So has the colleague called in sick or just not turned up?

Peachykeenjosephine · 30/07/2026 17:01

To be honest if I wasn't wanted I'd walk out too! They must have done quite a decent job if you're missing their presence!

Agrumpyknitter · 30/07/2026 17:02

If you want things to change with staffing levels then don’t pick up the extra. Let it drop. Make sure you have sent emails to your manager advising them of the situation. Sometimes you need to let things break before they get fixed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread