Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Andy Burnham is doing a decent job so far?

237 replies

spiceupyourlives · Yesterday 08:33

I’m really impressed by him working with the tories and Lib Dems on social care. It’s what we’ve needed more of in this country for so long, and a solution to the crisis will only come about if the next party to take charge is also committed to the solution.

OP posts:
Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:12

Thismountain · Yesterday 08:50

So you're a Jack Alright , do you suck up to bullies too?

We have absolutely no say in what America does or what happens in the ME. Neither do any of those other European leaders. The difference between them and us is that we like to pretend we are equal partners to the US and have any kind of 'special relationship' whatsoever. So voting on issues in another country that has nothing to do with us and who will take no notice of us is pure virtue signalling nonsense ( and a pretty colonialist mindset).

Fchane · Yesterday 09:13

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:03

Well if that's what's needed then so be it. They previous attempts have been scuppered by successive opposition parties/press ( death tax/dementia tax) so a consensus is really the only way. And they have excluded the ideological populists of Reform and the Greens so have a better chance of success ( hopefully)

I’m not arguing it’s a bad thing. It’s a shrewd political move and you’d expect politicians to politician. I just think this is his motivation.

LauraNorda · Yesterday 09:16

The Libdems have got zero chance of forming a majority government. Should have included Reform.

At the very least, we would have seen whether Reform do have any workable ideas.

GeneralPeter · Yesterday 09:16

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:05

Yes. Most 'Arabic' countries are allies of America ( Qatar, SA) and are also enemies of Iran (Persian) and are being bombed by them.

Edited

Not a bad point.

@Thismountain Would you feel better if the US and Israel allied with Arabic countries instead, and focused their attack on their main military foe in the region?

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · Yesterday 09:18

No political leader has been able to find a viable solution to social care yet. I hope that Burnham can work constructively with the Tories and the Libdems to come up with something that is actually workable and sustainable regardless of who is in power. It makes perfect sense to do this collaboratively.

The real question is not whether the talks are a good idea, as they obviously are, but whether politicians from all of the mainstream parties can put aside their political differences and engage constructively with the process in order to come up with a solution that they can all genuinely sign up to.

I would like to see far more cross party working across lots of issues - they do already do this effectively on many of the select committees etc. As Burnham has said, less point-scoring and more problem-solving. It would definitely help to restore people's trust in politics and politicians. But whether or not Burnham can actually drive this change and make it happen remains to be seen.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:19

Fchane · Yesterday 09:13

I’m not arguing it’s a bad thing. It’s a shrewd political move and you’d expect politicians to politician. I just think this is his motivation.

I mean he is a very skilled career politician, which Starmer was not. I do wonder why he lost 2 Labour leadership contests, but then I notice the winners were Ed Milliband and Jeremy Corbyn so says more about the Labour party arguably than him!

chirrupybird · Yesterday 09:21

He hasn't really done anything yet, he's going to talk about social care, where it will lead no one knows, he may be just covering his back so when he does whatever he does he can say (most of) the other parties agreed with him. although how much common ground may be found is dubious.

Binnyforthewin · Yesterday 09:25

I think he is doing ok. Nothing to write home about yet but he hasn't yet done a Truss and crashed the economy. I think the cross party stuff is probably to soften us for another "I'm going to work on social care but not give you any substance for 2 years " type speech today.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:26

GeneralPeter · Yesterday 09:16

Not a bad point.

@Thismountain Would you feel better if the US and Israel allied with Arabic countries instead, and focused their attack on their main military foe in the region?

This is what triggered the October 7 attacks in the first place. Saudi Arabia were due to start talks with Israel on trade etc cooperation and Iran wanted to scupper them so used their Hamas thugs to try and trigger another war in the ME. It was obvious Netenyahu was going to retaliate. He'd been itching for a reason to attack and Hamas/Iran were only too willing to give him one.

dottiedodah · Yesterday 09:26

I think he's full of good intentions. However things like having a No 10 in Manchester doesn't really work out .I think giving 4.5 grand to neet parents is also a bit of a gimmick.however he has got time yet

MeNotYouJustMe · Yesterday 09:27

Fchane · Yesterday 08:42

He’s doing it cross party because he is not willing to shoulder the fall out from the press. He’s spreading the accountability pain across the other parties he’s involved.

And, as PP said, means they can’t undo it. Politics needs to be consensus driven now - it’s what works in Scandinavian countries. Maybe give him a chance before writing him off 🙄

chirrupybird · Yesterday 09:28

Thismountain · Yesterday 08:45

He's still helping Israel and America attack Arabic people - think he's even worse than Starmer. We've been manipulated into thinking this is reasonable - I admire the European leaders who are moral and brave enough not to be bullied.

He did mutter about standing up to the US if necessary whether he would actually do this and what the consequences would be who knows. He hasn't really changed any policies so far and up till now our support for the US in Iran has been minimal. And as said by others most of the Arab countries support the US and Iran isn't Arabic but Persian.

MeNotYouJustMe · Yesterday 09:28

LauraNorda · Yesterday 09:16

The Libdems have got zero chance of forming a majority government. Should have included Reform.

At the very least, we would have seen whether Reform do have any workable ideas.

Reform have 5 MPs, LibDems have 72! Why on earth would you invite Reform??

randomchap · Yesterday 09:29

spiceupyourlives · Yesterday 08:48

Yes, me too. I think some reform leaning people are angry because Farage wasn’t invited.

Like he would have turned up anyway. He was hardly ever at the European Parliament, rarely attends the house of commons, and never holds surgeries in Clacton.

He's too busy toadying up to billionaires and making money

He's not here to make the UK better, just himself richer

peakyblenders · Yesterday 09:29

dottiedodah · Yesterday 09:26

I think he's full of good intentions. However things like having a No 10 in Manchester doesn't really work out .I think giving 4.5 grand to neet parents is also a bit of a gimmick.however he has got time yet

Why do you feel a Manchester No. 10 can’t work?

bafta16 · Yesterday 09:32

He attends meetings and isn't stoned/pissed.

Danhausenrocks · Yesterday 09:34

I think more cross party work is essential, particularly for something such as the NHS.

Involving the three biggest parties is a positive thing. I personally voted for Lib Dem last time because I genuinely think Ed Davey has some good plans and ideas for healthcare and should be listened to.

And Fag Ash Nige wouldn't want to be part of these talks, because he doesn't want to agree to helping fix the NHS when he could make more money from dismantling it and selling it off to the highest bidder. He just wants to bitch and moan.

In the same way he doesn't want to stop the boats (and let's not forget reform DID NOT vote for a new law that could help stop them) because if labour stop the boats, he has absolutely no ammo anymore.

Whatafustercluck · Yesterday 09:35

I've always liked Burnham, and admire his aspirations for investment in the north and passion for Manchester over the years (i am not from the north, so have no skin in the game in this respect). I wasn't a fan of how he became PM, and began to view him with some skepticism. I think the headlines so far have been positive, and perhaps he understands that getting the media on side is the largest battle. I'll reserve further judgement until I see whether his talk translates into action. He won't be able to do much with a weak economy, so I'd like to understand where the money is coming from to balance the books/ reduce national debt. And i am saying this as a lifelong Labour supporter.

LauraNorda · Yesterday 09:36

MeNotYouJustMe · Yesterday 09:28

Reform have 5 MPs, LibDems have 72! Why on earth would you invite Reform??

Well, that's due to our system. The Libdems got those 72 seats on 3,519,143 votes. Reforms 4,117,610 votes ended up with 5 seats.

toomanycoffeecups · Yesterday 09:36

Fchane · Yesterday 08:42

He’s doing it cross party because he is not willing to shoulder the fall out from the press. He’s spreading the accountability pain across the other parties he’s involved.

This kind of attitude is so ridiculous and exactly why the country is in such a mess and paralysed . Consensus is the FASTEST way to get changes done. Why the hell wouldn’t he want to get everyone together on this. It’s a problem across the party divide. This is the kind of attitude that keeps the status quo where nothing happens. You are far far happier to be able to crow from the sidelines that the Labour man fucked it up - than ‘God forbid’ succeed by taking a consensus approach to a national crisis in care. It’s small minded and rather sad.

chirrupybird · Yesterday 09:36

peakyblenders · Yesterday 09:29

Why do you feel a Manchester No. 10 can’t work?

I don't even know what he means by it, government policies have to work for the whole country, is he suggesting the north of the country will have different policies than the rest of the country? Is it just for Manchester? Will it be a glorified mayor's office? Or will it be just a talking shop that refers back to London? Or he just hangs out there sometimes instead of at Number 10 in London.

Binnyforthewin · Yesterday 09:36

LauraNorda · Yesterday 09:36

Well, that's due to our system. The Libdems got those 72 seats on 3,519,143 votes. Reforms 4,117,610 votes ended up with 5 seats.

Note how the Lib Dems have gone very quite on PR recently....

Supersleepysheepy · Yesterday 09:38

Too soon to tell, at the moment it is just words and there doesn't seem to be much focus on actual change and support for education at primary level.

Fchane · Yesterday 09:38

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · Yesterday 09:26

This is what triggered the October 7 attacks in the first place. Saudi Arabia were due to start talks with Israel on trade etc cooperation and Iran wanted to scupper them so used their Hamas thugs to try and trigger another war in the ME. It was obvious Netenyahu was going to retaliate. He'd been itching for a reason to attack and Hamas/Iran were only too willing to give him one.

I was with you until the ‘it was obvious BN would retaliate as he’s been itching for a reason’ comment.

Any leader in the entire world would give a comprehensive military response to a neighbour and their terrorist and state allies who launched an attack like Oct 7th. Absolutely no country could tolerate an enemy who did that, followed it up with firing tens of thousands of rockets at you and sending more terrorists into your country to murder your citizens, and who pledged their commitment to keep committing such sadistic attacks on your citizens and stated their intent to destroy your country. The tunnel system Hamas has it’s more akin to an underground city. It is hundreds of miles long and multi layer. Hamas and its allies have dedicated huge sums of money and many, many years to preparing for attacks like Oct 7th. Hezbollah have a similar tunnel network. That they will abduct and starve and country Israeli citizens in again if they can. No, no leader of any country would tolerate that. And the only country in the world that is expected to is Israel.

Binnyforthewin · Yesterday 09:39

chirrupybird · Yesterday 09:36

I don't even know what he means by it, government policies have to work for the whole country, is he suggesting the north of the country will have different policies than the rest of the country? Is it just for Manchester? Will it be a glorified mayor's office? Or will it be just a talking shop that refers back to London? Or he just hangs out there sometimes instead of at Number 10 in London.

Details details, Burnham will work on those later. Just like any student project the first step was to spend time on the logo, which was successfully ticked off in week one.

Swipe left for the next trending thread