Today in Brighton the facsists turned up. Brighton barely let them out of the station. Well done Brighton !

[00K]

I want to live there

No different to the arsehole who publicly bullied Jacob Rees-Mogg's kids to get at their dad. What kind, tolerant people these arseholes are.

To be fair, Brighton has been a place where people go for a fight since the days of Mods and Rockers. It's very difficult to tell the difference between Brighton before a riot and afterwards.

It looks like even with strong views on here the closest you’ll get to a yes is a feeble we already have one two miles away.

No, my idea keeps Farage and Reform out of the equation. Simply voting yes will give a very clear picture of all those who want the male asylum seekers and refugees to settle in their areas. No bullying tactics required.

If you want some actual facts listen to this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0nm4f5y?partner=uk.co.bbc&origin=share-mobile

They don't want it but they can't admit it. They want the warm fuzzy glow of feeling virtuous, while someone else has to deal the realities of our crazy asylum policies.

@drspouse Are you suggesting the MoJ data isn't factual data?

See my pp re: Reform's plans , who I won't be voting for. There are refugees housed in my area anyway.

So you’d tick yes then?

For @mrshohosuggestion

Yes like the protestors. Maximum virtue signalling points, whilst doing nothing much and taking no risks whatsoever. Pathetic, and transparent.

There are bullying tactics on this thread. Hounding people for a response to a fantasy tick box.

How is it a hard question? You’ve advocated for accepting the housing, and been vocal against those who haven’t.

Brighton are keen, some posters are happy about that @mrshoho asks directly a simple yes or no.

A friend of mine lives in Brighton. He says the actual locals have asked their MPs to campaign for students to have to vote in their home areas, not where their university is. They got fcked over with the (apparently) terrible Green council and have learnt their lesson.

You’d think that a proposal to block (and deport) all would be immigrants that intend to rape, behead, stab, ban homosexuality or otherwise damage our society wouldn’t be too big an ask would you? Apparently it is for many on this thread.

The suicidal empathy for the sort of men damaged by civil war, whose history will make it extremely difficult for them to function in a peaceful society being demonstrated by people in this thread.

I recently had a conversation with some nice people from Brighton wanting to get away from these extreme virtue signallers who turn nasty when their ideologies are challenged.

Brighton may end up being an enclave with some serious conflicts- the Gays for Gaza groups being in serious opposition to the immigrants from Muslim countries who are hard line anti gay for example.

In the top of extreme (and dangerous) virtue signallers, DH and I heard on the radio Zack Polanski’s declaration that the sentences for recently convicted terrorist Palestine Action group were too harsh.

Jesus christ, woman! Yes, I'll tick yes. Does that satisfy you? My council is actually proposing to repurpose a building around the corner from me to house asylum seekers who have been given leave to remain. I am fine with that.

Is this correct? Ive not seen any news about it.

Bristol is even worse apparently.

I feel their pain.

Are you serious?? How is that bullying?

What is it about the question that you find hard to answer?

Why so hard to answer. Jesus Christ woman back to you.

I have answered it.

Have you listened to the programme?

For those saying its just a minority of immigrant men that abuse women, ok, so you're saying youre happy to sacrifice a minority of British women and girls to these men, so you can pat yourselves on the back for letting in all the other men, got it.

So what is the number? How many women and girls are you happy to sacrifice? What number would be too high? Or will you always prioritise forign men over British women and girls?

Are you suggesting the MoJ data isn't factual data?

Ha. Yes they did. And what a stupid comment that was. Because surely the whole point of them is there would be no need for 'future asylum accommodation'.
In one statement they admit they won't be able to solve it either, and that asylum seekers are simply their weapon to gain support under false pretences.