Andy Slavitt @ASlavitt
ALERT: A team of folks have just read the Upton amendment. Intended to be spent on ppl w pre-ex in a paltry way.
There's a major shock.1
1:53 am · 4 May 2017
Andy Slavitt @ASlavitt
Replying to @ASlavitt
I want to make sure I'm factual so give me a few minutes.
But this amendment looks like a shell game. 2
t
GOP leaders have created a fog of war. Team is working like crazy going through language finding things. Here's what they saw... 3
This $8B targeted to take care of ppl w pre-existing conditions . . .
doesn't have to be used for ppl w pre-existing conditions. 4
The number of times the words "pre-existing conditions" are used in the bill . . . Is ZERO. 5
Meanwhile, someone please count the times the words "pre-existing conditions" are in the GOP secretly obtained talking points. 6
People who vote for this won't have had time to read it. Let alone analyze it. But I will best I can so there can be no EXCUSES tomorrow.7
First of all, high risk pools are terrible and at best provide 2nd tier coverage. In his case underfunded to about 30,000 ppl nationally.8
Second, it's not enough money.
And as @AislingMcDL points out in her feed, Fred Upton knows that. 9
3rd, states only get the money if they CUT essential benefits & pre-ex. An incentive 2 cut.
And the money goes from taxpayers 2 insurers.10
And now-- the kicker. The $ can go to subsidize healthy people anyway. 11