Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread gallery
140
SerendipityJane · 16/11/2025 14:27

MsJinks · 16/11/2025 12:52

Perhaps he failed at sex on camera 🤮🤮
That’s a great point - probably unflattering descriptions of him in general upsetting his Orange ego - it could well be I’m way overthinking and simplest explanation is the best.
I think abortions wouldn’t phase his followers - he could have ‘repented’ or more like not his progeny, and ‘fake news’.

Could be the opposite of abortion ? Imagine a dark skinned chap popping up, aged 50, who is the spit of Trump with the DNA to match ? I wonder if he'd be called Thomas Trump ? Or Donald Jefferson ?

AcrossthePond55 · 16/11/2025 14:39

In other news, Former VP Dick Cheney's funeral will be in the Nat'l Cathedral on Thursday 20 Nov. and is by invitation only. His daughter is Liz Cheney, who was removed from GOP leadership due to pressure from SCROTUS.

Shall we take bets on who won't be invited?

SerendipityJane · 16/11/2025 15:04

AcrossthePond55 · 16/11/2025 14:39

In other news, Former VP Dick Cheney's funeral will be in the Nat'l Cathedral on Thursday 20 Nov. and is by invitation only. His daughter is Liz Cheney, who was removed from GOP leadership due to pressure from SCROTUS.

Shall we take bets on who won't be invited?

If I were going to plan on deposing Donald Trump, that is exactly where I would (let him believe) expect it ti happen.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 16/11/2025 15:15

Spandauer · 16/11/2025 12:29

As we know only too well, Drumpf only cares about himself and that he is regarded and lauded for being successful, brilliant at business, rich, intelligent (high IQ is his go-to description for anyone he "likes") as well as being in perfect health and super virile (🤮) etc etc. So he could be more worried about evidence coming out from the Epstein docs that he was/is a complete loser/low IQ/failed businessman more than any underage sex stuff.

It is more than likely that there are abortions in his past, given his recorded proclivities... But even if they involved force, under age females, lives lost/ruined would they dent the MAGA and Repug support?

After typing all the above, perhaps the silver bullet that he truly fears IS evidence of a same sex encounter coming out? I just can't see it though...unless drugs were involved?

Reading this, it occurs to me that a lot of emails in the TrEpstein files about how the "girls" have been laughing over Trump's increasingly desperate attempts to have sex with them at all might just be what he is so keen to censor – not because his base would reject him over them, but because one thing he cannot bear is being laughed at, and he is strongly invested in his self-image as virile. And being laughed at for not being virile would be horrendous for him if it were made public.

Stormy Daniels seemed unimpressed by sex with him, so it's possible she was not the only one who felt that way.

SerendipityJane · 16/11/2025 16:43

Trump now blaming John Sauer for losing the tariff case ...

AcrossthePond55 · 16/11/2025 17:13

Per Rep Jamie Raskin on Velshi this morning (MS NOW), the vote on Epstein Files will be up for a vote on Tuesday. My guess is there will be debate before the vote so who knows exactly when it will happen on Tuesday.

Bear in mind that it still has to be passed in the Senate and then signed by SCROTUS. So even if it does pass both houses, I doubt very much that he'll sign it.

SerendipityJane · 16/11/2025 17:28

AcrossthePond55 · 16/11/2025 17:13

Per Rep Jamie Raskin on Velshi this morning (MS NOW), the vote on Epstein Files will be up for a vote on Tuesday. My guess is there will be debate before the vote so who knows exactly when it will happen on Tuesday.

Bear in mind that it still has to be passed in the Senate and then signed by SCROTUS. So even if it does pass both houses, I doubt very much that he'll sign it.

Edited

If I heard correctly it doesn't need to go before the senate if it gets 2/3 majority.

And a lot of Republicans have been vague about their voting intentions.

Remember Trump can't stay there forever, unless he plans on not dying. So his successor will be very keen to make sure they don't miss their chance.

Once SCOTUS have castrated his big beautiful tariff scam, it could be open season. We all like a bit of turkey for thanksgiving ....

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 16/11/2025 17:41

AcrossthePond55 · 16/11/2025 17:13

Per Rep Jamie Raskin on Velshi this morning (MS NOW), the vote on Epstein Files will be up for a vote on Tuesday. My guess is there will be debate before the vote so who knows exactly when it will happen on Tuesday.

Bear in mind that it still has to be passed in the Senate and then signed by SCROTUS. So even if it does pass both houses, I doubt very much that he'll sign it.

Edited

Wasn't something being said about it being made veto-proof if enough of Congress, or was it the Senate, or both, vote for it?

SerendipityJane · 16/11/2025 17:52

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 16/11/2025 17:41

Wasn't something being said about it being made veto-proof if enough of Congress, or was it the Senate, or both, vote for it?

Edited

As MTG shows, there is a very real fear of voter backlash in some deep red states. I guess that's the downside of trying to play a bunch of guys with guns.

MTG seems to be working on the basis that what she is hearing from the people she needs to vote for her next time is exactly what she is doing now. I guess she has looked at her career and Trumps age and worked out which she wants to run for longest.

AcrossthePond55 · 16/11/2025 18:19

@SerendipityJane @AskingQuestionsAllTheTime

No, it does have to pass both Houses. The 2/3 majority rule is if SCROTUS vetos it, it goes back to Congress and a 2/3 vote in both Houses overrides his veto and passes the resolution.

If he does sign or if they override his veto the DOJ is the agency that will oversee the release. And as we know, SCROTUS has the director in his pocket and has 'stacked' the agency with loyalists. Who knows what delaying tactics or 'redacted for national security' will magically appear.

Spandauer · 16/11/2025 18:27

The vote and surrounding hoo-hah is keeping the pressure on him - which is 'enjoyable' in itself.

Cobwebs in Congress, Bigly Ballrooms, Tariff Tantrums, Dementia Denials - Trump Thread #150
OP posts:
Errolwasahero · 16/11/2025 22:41

Hi all, long time lurker I don’t expect you to remember me! My ‘go to’ conspiracy theory nowadays is ‘It’s Russia’. Have been following your discussion about the files, and I found myself wondering if there is something in there that points conclusively to him being funded by them? I mean, wasn’t there something about Malania coming via Epstein? Just thinking that, just maybe, that is what he’s actually scared of. Would MAGA forgive him that?

PerkingFaintly · 17/11/2025 00:18

Brew @Errolwasahero , welcome back!

I certainly recognise your name, though I can't remember from whereabouts on MN.

AcrossthePond55 · 17/11/2025 00:22

I see that SCROTUS is now referring to her as Marjorie 'traitor' Taylor Greene. I think he's mentally unable NOT give someone who's crossed him a disparaging nickname. It's the epitome of childishness.

DuncinToffee · 17/11/2025 08:31

He knows he isn't going to win the vote so now he is telling 'fake news' reporters that he wants the files to be released.

SerendipityJane · 17/11/2025 09:54

DuncinToffee · 17/11/2025 08:31

He knows he isn't going to win the vote so now he is telling 'fake news' reporters that he wants the files to be released.

Could this be the biggest gaslight in history coming up ?

jumpingthehighjump · 17/11/2025 09:58

wasn’t there something about Malania coming via Epstein?

There is a lot online about melania and Putin and Russia and her visa and obviously Epstein

CaveMum · 17/11/2025 09:58

By stating “we’ve got nothing to hide” he’s just preparing the ground to declare anything they do dig up as fake news/AI.

To be honest I’m surprised he didn’t opt for this approach earlier, which is what makes me agree with Mooch that something is throwing 🍑 off his usual game.

Like him or loathe him, he usually has good political instincts, so this episode stands out as unusual.

SerendipityJane · 17/11/2025 10:59

To be honest I’m surprised he didn’t opt for this approach earlier,

Or assign a special prosecutor. Both courses of action that he would have been advised to take way back when.

History tell us dictators who don't take advice shorten their shelf life

BestIsWest · 17/11/2025 11:02

This is exactly what Anthony Scaramucci predicted would be his best move on TRIP US last week. Fake news! AI!

Talkinpeace · 17/11/2025 11:15

Hi @Errolwasahero I remember you. I was probably Listening Quietly when we were last chatting.

Russian money funded the latest Trump Tower in New York.
The rest all flows from there.

Spandauer · 17/11/2025 12:39

Why Trump can't make the Epstein scandal go away.
His ordinary scandal management techniques are not working.
https://www.publicnotice.co/p/trump-epstein-coverup-strategy

Welcome back @Errolwasahero 👋

Why Trump can't make the Epstein scandal go away

His ordinary scandal management techniques are not working.

https://www.publicnotice.co/p/trump-epstein-coverup-strategy

OP posts:
AcrossthePond55 · 17/11/2025 14:42

SCROTUS has done a volte-face on the Epstein files because they've either already been 'cleaned up' or the plan to stall the release is now in place.

What will be interesting to see is if, now that he's 'in favour' of it, he'll actually sign the resolution. Or is this all a ploy and he'll end up vetoing it.

MsJinks · 17/11/2025 14:51

Excellent article @Spandauer- really clear explanation of Trumpian moves.
he’s handling it so badly when normally he cuts through any amount of his own caused shite to come up smelling of orange roses that it’s been difficult to understand why it’s not working as well.
I (unfortunately) saw great support for him on X only yesterday, just acceptance Trump is not involved but all the Dem presidents have been. For his followers it would be cognitive dissonance at its finest but I don’t think many really consider the opposing facts’ or how it doesn’t add up, so no conflicting thoughts. Obviously Marjorie Greene and Broebart aren’t listening to him, but they’ve not the pull of Trump mania - hopefully enough will realise to affect his (baffling) hold on his cult followers.

DuncinToffee · 17/11/2025 15:41

I recognise you @Errolwasahero

In a good way Smile

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread