Why is no one on here talking about that Prince Andrew video?

[UseHerName]

Or have I missed it? Maybe it’s being discussed in code to prevent the thread from being axed?

the one of him and Eugenie looking at the flowers and tributes - looks like it’s from the Aussie 7news channel…

In this case it turns a continuous moment when he crouches down and moves his arm into something lingering.

Because that’s what happens when you slow film down - there are missing frames between the original frames. Fast subjects or big speed reductions result in bigger movements between the missing frames so the action appears jerky and blurred.

To get really good slowmo video you need 120fps.

For all those on here who think Andrew assaulted his daughter in that clip I hope you are reporting it to the police then, but something tells me that you won't.

This is why Jimmy Saville got away with groping teenagers in public. There is footage of him on TV several times touching up teenage girls and you can see them moving away from him.
But many people think nobody would do this in public when being filmed. They do not realise part of the thrill for men like this is doing it in plain sight and getting away with it.

Eugenie didn't move away from him, I'm sure there would have been a reaction from her if what people are claiming actually happened.

The law does not apply to the Royal Family. I am surprised you have not yet realised that.

Or she is used to this kind of shit from him.

Haha

Scraping the barrel now @antelopevalley.

Antelopevalley - Yeah, because really you know that he didn't actually do anything. That slow motion clip has been doctored, just look at the thumb, it practically disappears.

Hear hear.

What a load of old tosh.
He bent down and his arm was left there albeit in an awkward position.
Nothing to see here.

I read somewhere, can't remember where as it was before he was elected, that those clips of Biden are so short because they look bad out of context and that they were children/young women he knows well and some are family and him kissing them was normal. Apparently if you see them in context they look fine.

Don't know but I've got to the point where if I don't see it live with my own eyes I really don't know. I'd hate to do jury service.

This is such an interesting post. It's well proven that people unconsciously tend to believe things more readily if they fit with their pre-conceived ideas about the world. Something that seems new in recent years is that people now do this consciously, or almost consciously- there's a new willingness to profess and believe that something is true just because it tends to fit with the speaker's world view, even if the evidence of their eyes contradicts it. It's why fake news has such a hold on the world.

Here a poster implies that anyone saying what they can actually see (no assault) must be attesting to a particular world view (support for Andrew). No space at all for the idea that Andrew could be a sleazy evil man and not have assaulted his daughter in front of the world's press. No wonder the world is in a mess.

I watched it live and re-watched it again just now. It is just a grieving father comforting his grieving daughter. This thread is really disrespectful and inappropriate.

in all the stuff raked up about Andrew over the past few years, it's amazing that no one came up with stories and videos of him silting his daughters in public given that's clearly the sort of thing he does regularly.

silting = assaulting

What appalling ignorance. You clearly know nothing about power, abuse, or trauma. This is in the same vein of "why didn't she leave him".

This. The number of times I just stood there while being groped because wtf else was I meant to do? Especially at the funeral- what, was I going to scream and cry and make a fuss there, when the focus was my late uncle? I just stood there. Because no one was going to believe it anyway, he must have done it accidentally, and I’d just be being dramatic again.

That's my take too. Even if he was one to do that, OF COURSE he wouldn't do it in public with the world's eyes on him. It was an innocent blunder when he bent down. Come on.

And yes, creepy Joe's handsy activity - and hair smelling - is well documented.

You do not understand that for sexual abusers they get a thrill out of doing stuff in public and getting away with it. This is well documented.

^
they rely on the ‘surely not!’ reaction.

Exactly this.

The unhinged are out in force. Desperately pathetic.