Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Linehan tweeting misogyny and racism now

531 replies

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 17/07/2026 21:32

Seems to have completed his lurch to the far-right - in addition to his vocal support of Trump, I suppose his 'defender of women and girls' schtick doesn't really wash any more...

Linehan tweeting misogyny and racism now
Linehan tweeting misogyny and racism now
Linehan tweeting misogyny and racism now
OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 01:30

Imane Khelif has DSD, a condition which gives her testosterone. Sure, maybe it gives her an advantage, but it's a completely natural condition. Should we ban basketball players for being too tall next?

OP posts:
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 18/07/2026 01:35

I was having trouble sleeping but having perused another boring leftist attempt at character assassination I can feel myself nodding off. So thanks for that. 👍

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/07/2026 01:47

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 01:26

Again, that's just not true. You're just blatantly wrong. Imane Khelif was born female. Find me literally any source that says she was born male.

The source is his DNA test.

nutmeg7 · 18/07/2026 01:48

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 01:13

Sorry, but that's empirically not true. Look it up literally anywhere. She is not trans.

Having a DSD is not the same as being trans. You seem a bit ignorant.

Did you really just start a thread to try and make random women on here responsible for everything Glinner says online?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/07/2026 01:49

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 01:30

Imane Khelif has DSD, a condition which gives her testosterone. Sure, maybe it gives her an advantage, but it's a completely natural condition. Should we ban basketball players for being too tall next?

Imane Khelif is male with a male DSD.

nutmeg7 · 18/07/2026 01:53

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 01:30

Imane Khelif has DSD, a condition which gives her testosterone. Sure, maybe it gives her an advantage, but it's a completely natural condition. Should we ban basketball players for being too tall next?

Oh dear.
Seems you need to do a bit of reading about the DSD 5-ARD.

Women don’t produce testosterone in the male range. Men with internal testicles do though.

Don’t embarrass yourself showing your ignorance on this topic - stick to your smearing and character assassinations instead.

AnAutumnCrow · 18/07/2026 02:00

nutmeg7 · 18/07/2026 01:48

Having a DSD is not the same as being trans. You seem a bit ignorant.

Did you really just start a thread to try and make random women on here responsible for everything Glinner says online?

Incidentally, Julie Bindel is facing this kind of ‘guilt by association’ crapola today on X by him off Byline Times and JB is alleging defamation. She’s sued before, Pink News and its editor I believe, and received damages, an apology and a retraction.

I think she may shortly be suing for the defamatory ‘guilt by association’ stuff written about her on X, should she not receive a retraction and apology from Mr Byline. One to watch 👀

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 02:20

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/07/2026 01:49

Imane Khelif is male with a male DSD.

Depends on the biological framework used.

Male in the sense of binary reproductive sex but female in the sense of bi/multi modal trait sex.

But good luck teaching cultists new tricks.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 03:40

Whisperingwaters · 17/07/2026 23:22

Except the far right has no intention of doing 'right' when it comes to women's rights in general unless you cluelessly consider a return to full time white incubator duty one.

It's Leftist academics who promote surrogacy with books titles things like "Full Surrogacy Now", not Right-leaning traditionalists. It's Leftists who promote surrogacy as a "solution" to the sterilisating effect of wrong-sex hormones on trans-identifying people's bodies.

Surrogacy is pretty much defined as "turning a woman into an incubator". It's generally the Right who oppose this.

Remind me again of the political orientation of the US President who signed into law Executive Orders protecting women's sports and women in prison?

And before you howl "abortion ban", that's not what the overturning of Roe did. Some states chose to ban abortion, whilst several states have since made abortion a right in their state constitutions. Two states voted for Trump and voted for constitutional abortion rights on the same ballot paper.

We keep being told that the Right will destroy women's rights, but, Texas and South Dakota's abortion laws aside, we aren't actually seeing it in the most Right-leaning US administration I've seen in my lifetime.

Firetreev · 18/07/2026 03:55

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 17/07/2026 21:46

I would genuinely love to hear your explanation as to how what he's saying isn't misogynist

He's a wrong un, as are many in the GC movement - it's why I stopped engaging with it. You can believe that a man can never be a woman and vice versa without engaging in bigotry and intolerance.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 03:59

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 01:24

The coin doesn't even mention race - but even if it did... Brunel's structures were built by slaves brought in through Bristol. So yes, black people literally did build much of Britain.

Also... Do you think one coin should encompass a history over a thousand years? Or do you think that maybe, maybe, it'd be nice to acknowledge that, over the last century, the country has become more diverse? Again, I'm really interested to know what we're celebrating by not acknowledging this...

Brunel's structures were built by slaves brought in through Bristol.

That cannot possibly be true. Somerset vs Stewart (1772) established that holding someone as a slave breached habeus corpus and was hence illegal under common law. It was hence citeably illegal to enslave someone in England from 1772 onwards.

Slavery was outlawed in Scotland under the Colliers (Scotland) Act 1799, making slavery illegal throughout Great Britain.

Anyone enslaved in the colonies who landed in any port in Great Britain from 1799 onwards was automatically freed, by dint of slavery being illegal here.

Brunel wasn't born until 1806.

Every time you or one of your fellow travellers posts something so easily disproved, you tell the entire thread and all lurkers that one or more of the following is true:

  • That you wilfully lie.
  • That you do not fact-check what other people tell you.
  • That you repeat what other people have said to you without stopping to ask yourself, "is this true?"

#OperationLetThemSpeak is working as planned.

Justme56 · 18/07/2026 04:04

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 02:20

Depends on the biological framework used.

Male in the sense of binary reproductive sex but female in the sense of bi/multi modal trait sex.

But good luck teaching cultists new tricks.

What female traits does a person with 5ARD have. Under developed / unviralised male traits aren’t female nor is ambiguous genitalia? What female parts are you highlighting?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 04:06

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 02:20

Depends on the biological framework used.

Male in the sense of binary reproductive sex but female in the sense of bi/multi modal trait sex.

But good luck teaching cultists new tricks.

For sports, a functioning SRY gene should disqualify a competitor from the women's category. Male puberty is the key factor here.

I find it amusing that you dismiss us as "cultists" who don't understand biology when there are several university biologists amongst the board regulars. We know about Mullerian and Wolffian ducts here.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 04:13

nutmeg7 · 18/07/2026 01:48

Having a DSD is not the same as being trans. You seem a bit ignorant.

Did you really just start a thread to try and make random women on here responsible for everything Glinner says online?

Exactly. The point of this thread is to smear us with guilt by association.

It's as ridiculous as suggesting that anyone who prefers motorways over A roads for long journeys is a literal Nazi because Hitler thought the same and so organised the building of the autobahns.

LBFseBrom · 18/07/2026 04:16

I'd never heard of him. I googled and found an Irish comedy scriptwriter and presume you mean him. He looks revolting (which I daresay is irrelevant), and is vocal with his opinions but how does a man like him really affect us? He doesn't strike me as a charismatic figure with influence.

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 04:23

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 03:40

It's Leftist academics who promote surrogacy with books titles things like "Full Surrogacy Now", not Right-leaning traditionalists. It's Leftists who promote surrogacy as a "solution" to the sterilisating effect of wrong-sex hormones on trans-identifying people's bodies.

Surrogacy is pretty much defined as "turning a woman into an incubator". It's generally the Right who oppose this.

Remind me again of the political orientation of the US President who signed into law Executive Orders protecting women's sports and women in prison?

And before you howl "abortion ban", that's not what the overturning of Roe did. Some states chose to ban abortion, whilst several states have since made abortion a right in their state constitutions. Two states voted for Trump and voted for constitutional abortion rights on the same ballot paper.

We keep being told that the Right will destroy women's rights, but, Texas and South Dakota's abortion laws aside, we aren't actually seeing it in the most Right-leaning US administration I've seen in my lifetime.

"It's Leftist academics who promote surrogacy with books titles things like "Full Surrogacy Now", not Right-leaning traditionalists. It's Leftists who promote surrogacy as a "solution" to the sterilisating effect of wrong-sex hormones on trans-identifying people's bodies."

The left's support for surrogacy is the non commercial kind which is consistent with their principles of bodily autonomy. You know, the very same principle that underpinned feminism. Principles don't qualify as principles if they aren't applied consistently.

Remind me again of the political orientation of the US President who signed into law Executive Orders protecting women's sports and women in prison?

Biden unlike Trump understands he is bound by constitutional law.The Biden administration stated that indiscriminately housing transgender women in men's prisons was a violation of the Eighth Amendment (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) due to extreme risks of violence.

The Biden admin took the same approach with school sports because they thought a blanket ban would violate the 14th amendment but courts later ruled it didn't & they dropped the change.

"Title IX Rule Proposals (2023): The Department of Education proposed a new Title IX rule that would prevent schools from enacting blanket bans on transgender athletes, generally allowing younger students to participate on teams aligning with their gender identity. However, it permitted schools to implement limits in competitive high school and college sports to ensure fairness and prevent injury.

And there's many a left wing government globally that have imposed women's sports & prisons restrictions.

And before you howl "abortion ban", that's not what the overturning of Roe did. Some states chose to ban abortion, whilst several states have since made abortion a right in their state constitutions. Two states voted for Trump and voted for constitutional abortion rights on the same ballot paper.

Currently, 20 have banned or heavily restricted abortion at early stages of pregnancy, while the remaining 30 states and Washington, D.C., broadly protect abortion access. So overturning Roe effectively removed reproductive rights to almost half the country.

We keep being told that the Right will destroy women's rights, but, Texas and South Dakota's abortion laws aside, we aren't actually seeing it in the most Right-leaning US administration I've seen in my lifetime.

"The Trump administration significantly contributed to the rollback of women's rights through the appointment of conservative judges who overturned Roe v. Wade, the reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule cutting global health funding, the repeal of workplace pay-data requirements, and the dismantling of federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. 1, 2, , 5]
These rollbacks span domestic policy, international aid, and government infrastructure. 1]

Reproductive Health and Bodily Autonomy

  • Supreme Court Appointments: By appointing three conservative justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, the administration paved the way for the fall of Roe v. Wade, ending the federal constitutional right to an abortion and allowing states to ban the procedure. 1, 2, 3]
  • Contraceptive Access: The administration rolled back the Affordable Care Act's mandate that required employers to provide free birth control coverage. [, 2]
  • Global Gag Rule: The administration expanded and reinstated this policy, which barred foreign non-governmental organizations from receiving U.S. health assistance if they provided, referred, or advocated for abortion services. 1,

Workplace Equity and Civil Rights

  • Equal Pay: The administration suspended an Obama-era rule that required large companies to report salary data broken down by race and gender, which was intended to combat the gender pay gap. 1]
  • DEI and Gender Equality Councils: Executive actions repealed diversity initiatives across the federal government and dismantled the White House Gender Policy Council. 1]

International Aid and Health

  • USAID and Global Health: The administration initiated broad freezes on foreign assistance, directly halting global maternal and child health programs, as well as initiatives preventing gender-based violence in developing nations. 1, 2]
  • Geneva Consensus Declaration: The administration championed and co-signed this international anti-abortion pact, which asserts there is no international right to abortion. 1, 2, 3]

As I said upthread cultists with justify anything….

Hundreds demonstrate for reproductive rights outside the Heritage Foundation following Donald Trump’s election as US president, Washington, DC, November 9, 2024. The Heritage Foundation is a conservative think-tank responsible for Project 2025, a plan...

Interview: Women’s Rights Under Trump

Donald Trump’s first administration as US president attacked women’s rights across a broad range of issues. What could his second term mean for women in the United States and beyond? The director of Human Rights Watch’s women’s rights division, Macaren...

https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/11/18/interview-womens-rights-under-trump

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 04:34

Justme56 · 18/07/2026 04:04

What female traits does a person with 5ARD have. Under developed / unviralised male traits aren’t female nor is ambiguous genitalia? What female parts are you highlighting?

DSD's aren't a morphological monolith. Ambiguous vaginas in 5ARD persons are only considered typical but not certain. In other words, anything is possible.

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 04:37

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 04:06

For sports, a functioning SRY gene should disqualify a competitor from the women's category. Male puberty is the key factor here.

I find it amusing that you dismiss us as "cultists" who don't understand biology when there are several university biologists amongst the board regulars. We know about Mullerian and Wolffian ducts here.

Lol, even Richard Dawkins is in denial about bi modality. But just like Linehan he was 'betrayed' by the left after outing him as a misogynist so 'pretends' not to know as pay back.

AmazeAmazeRocky · 18/07/2026 04:50

GiddyGiddyGiddy · 18/07/2026 00:48

I pointed out that a man who claims to be in favour of women's rights (and who many on this very site love to shower with praise) is actually a clear misogynist on the feminism board? Yes, I did. What's your point?

I agree with you. He started off supporting gender critical women but somewhere along the way it’s got twisted and he’s now posting bile. The first time I saw it was after Renee Good was murdered and stupidly thought for a moment he must have been hacked.

lemmein · 18/07/2026 04:52

He can be a massive nob, and what you’ve said about him is probably true - but I don’t think the screenshots in your OP are evidence of that. He’s said far worse!

I’ve followed & unfollowed him a fair few times on Twitter. I wholly agree with him on the trans issue-hence the follow- but then he just gets on my nerves after a few weeks so I take him off. I think he’s a bit (a lot!) weird & needy with JKR which puts me off him too.

I think he’s been treat really badly though & probably has fairly serious MH problems as a result so I try not to judge him too harshly.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 05:00

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 03:59

Brunel's structures were built by slaves brought in through Bristol.

That cannot possibly be true. Somerset vs Stewart (1772) established that holding someone as a slave breached habeus corpus and was hence illegal under common law. It was hence citeably illegal to enslave someone in England from 1772 onwards.

Slavery was outlawed in Scotland under the Colliers (Scotland) Act 1799, making slavery illegal throughout Great Britain.

Anyone enslaved in the colonies who landed in any port in Great Britain from 1799 onwards was automatically freed, by dint of slavery being illegal here.

Brunel wasn't born until 1806.

Every time you or one of your fellow travellers posts something so easily disproved, you tell the entire thread and all lurkers that one or more of the following is true:

  • That you wilfully lie.
  • That you do not fact-check what other people tell you.
  • That you repeat what other people have said to you without stopping to ask yourself, "is this true?"

#OperationLetThemSpeak is working as planned.

And if you were thinking of Brunel Senior, he didn't move to England and build stuff here until 1799, so try again.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 05:02

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 04:37

Lol, even Richard Dawkins is in denial about bi modality. But just like Linehan he was 'betrayed' by the left after outing him as a misogynist so 'pretends' not to know as pay back.

No one is in denial of bimodality of secondary sex characteristics.

Gametes, on the other hand, are an absolute binary. No woman can produce sperm. No man can release ova.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 05:35

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 04:23

"It's Leftist academics who promote surrogacy with books titles things like "Full Surrogacy Now", not Right-leaning traditionalists. It's Leftists who promote surrogacy as a "solution" to the sterilisating effect of wrong-sex hormones on trans-identifying people's bodies."

The left's support for surrogacy is the non commercial kind which is consistent with their principles of bodily autonomy. You know, the very same principle that underpinned feminism. Principles don't qualify as principles if they aren't applied consistently.

Remind me again of the political orientation of the US President who signed into law Executive Orders protecting women's sports and women in prison?

Biden unlike Trump understands he is bound by constitutional law.The Biden administration stated that indiscriminately housing transgender women in men's prisons was a violation of the Eighth Amendment (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) due to extreme risks of violence.

The Biden admin took the same approach with school sports because they thought a blanket ban would violate the 14th amendment but courts later ruled it didn't & they dropped the change.

"Title IX Rule Proposals (2023): The Department of Education proposed a new Title IX rule that would prevent schools from enacting blanket bans on transgender athletes, generally allowing younger students to participate on teams aligning with their gender identity. However, it permitted schools to implement limits in competitive high school and college sports to ensure fairness and prevent injury.

And there's many a left wing government globally that have imposed women's sports & prisons restrictions.

And before you howl "abortion ban", that's not what the overturning of Roe did. Some states chose to ban abortion, whilst several states have since made abortion a right in their state constitutions. Two states voted for Trump and voted for constitutional abortion rights on the same ballot paper.

Currently, 20 have banned or heavily restricted abortion at early stages of pregnancy, while the remaining 30 states and Washington, D.C., broadly protect abortion access. So overturning Roe effectively removed reproductive rights to almost half the country.

We keep being told that the Right will destroy women's rights, but, Texas and South Dakota's abortion laws aside, we aren't actually seeing it in the most Right-leaning US administration I've seen in my lifetime.

"The Trump administration significantly contributed to the rollback of women's rights through the appointment of conservative judges who overturned Roe v. Wade, the reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule cutting global health funding, the repeal of workplace pay-data requirements, and the dismantling of federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. 1, 2, , 5]
These rollbacks span domestic policy, international aid, and government infrastructure. 1]

Reproductive Health and Bodily Autonomy

  • Supreme Court Appointments: By appointing three conservative justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, the administration paved the way for the fall of Roe v. Wade, ending the federal constitutional right to an abortion and allowing states to ban the procedure. 1, 2, 3]
  • Contraceptive Access: The administration rolled back the Affordable Care Act's mandate that required employers to provide free birth control coverage. [, 2]
  • Global Gag Rule: The administration expanded and reinstated this policy, which barred foreign non-governmental organizations from receiving U.S. health assistance if they provided, referred, or advocated for abortion services. 1,

Workplace Equity and Civil Rights

  • Equal Pay: The administration suspended an Obama-era rule that required large companies to report salary data broken down by race and gender, which was intended to combat the gender pay gap. 1]
  • DEI and Gender Equality Councils: Executive actions repealed diversity initiatives across the federal government and dismantled the White House Gender Policy Council. 1]

International Aid and Health

  • USAID and Global Health: The administration initiated broad freezes on foreign assistance, directly halting global maternal and child health programs, as well as initiatives preventing gender-based violence in developing nations. 1, 2]
  • Geneva Consensus Declaration: The administration championed and co-signed this international anti-abortion pact, which asserts there is no international right to abortion. 1, 2, 3]

As I said upthread cultists with justify anything….

  • Reproductive rights aren't the be-all and end-all of women's rights.
  • Aid spending is a foreign policy decision, not a women's rights issue.
  • Roe arguably tried to overextend the right to privacy. Overturning it didn't itself ban abortion anywhere, but allowed states to decide. It's the banning states that are anti-woman.
  • "Gender pay gap" reports mean nothing when your govt says any man can claim to be a woman. Over here, FWS took the Scottish govt to court about that and eventually Westminster stepped in to lay down the law. If US companies are logging male staff as female, there's no point forcing them to submit pay gap reports.
  • Non-commercial surrogacy is incompatible with women's and newborn babies' rights in the same way that "consensual" strangulation is. Some things are so dangerous or plain stupid that we shouldn't admit A's "consent" as B's defence for doing the thing to A. Implanting an embryo into an unrelated adult to create a baby for the purposes of adoption is one of those plain stupid things: increased risk of complications for both mother and baby, and adoption is traumatic for the baby and should be the option of last resort, not a planned outcome.

Biden unlike Trump understands he is bound by constitutional law.The Biden administration stated that indiscriminately housing transgender women in men's prisons was a violation of the Eighth Amendment (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) due to extreme risks of violence.

"The Biden adminstration stated that..."

Not the courts, but the Biden govt. In other words, Biden's politically-motivated policy decision enacted to play to the hard left gallery, not the actual constitutional law. In doing so, Biden violated the reproductive right to freedom from another prisoner forcing a woman to be pregnant and violated the women's Eighth Amendment rights by locking them up with men. It takes some seriously warped thinking to pretend that women's Eight Amendment rights aren't violated by incarcerating them with men. Cultists will justify anything...

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 18/07/2026 05:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Whisperingwaters · 18/07/2026 06:37

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 18/07/2026 05:35

  • Reproductive rights aren't the be-all and end-all of women's rights.
  • Aid spending is a foreign policy decision, not a women's rights issue.
  • Roe arguably tried to overextend the right to privacy. Overturning it didn't itself ban abortion anywhere, but allowed states to decide. It's the banning states that are anti-woman.
  • "Gender pay gap" reports mean nothing when your govt says any man can claim to be a woman. Over here, FWS took the Scottish govt to court about that and eventually Westminster stepped in to lay down the law. If US companies are logging male staff as female, there's no point forcing them to submit pay gap reports.
  • Non-commercial surrogacy is incompatible with women's and newborn babies' rights in the same way that "consensual" strangulation is. Some things are so dangerous or plain stupid that we shouldn't admit A's "consent" as B's defence for doing the thing to A. Implanting an embryo into an unrelated adult to create a baby for the purposes of adoption is one of those plain stupid things: increased risk of complications for both mother and baby, and adoption is traumatic for the baby and should be the option of last resort, not a planned outcome.

Biden unlike Trump understands he is bound by constitutional law.The Biden administration stated that indiscriminately housing transgender women in men's prisons was a violation of the Eighth Amendment (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) due to extreme risks of violence.

"The Biden adminstration stated that..."

Not the courts, but the Biden govt. In other words, Biden's politically-motivated policy decision enacted to play to the hard left gallery, not the actual constitutional law. In doing so, Biden violated the reproductive right to freedom from another prisoner forcing a woman to be pregnant and violated the women's Eighth Amendment rights by locking them up with men. It takes some seriously warped thinking to pretend that women's Eight Amendment rights aren't violated by incarcerating them with men. Cultists will justify anything...

Like I keep sayin' cultists will justify anything…..