He said Brand obviously a creep and he agreed that having non consenting anal sex "probably is technically rape" but the fact the girl was cheating on her boyfriend and admitted to rimming Brand when they first met...it was more like the anal sex was "things getting out of hand". He said more like a "play fight gone wrong". She was "clearly into extreme stuff". He then backtracked saying "no, it is awful... but context changes things and she was no angel". He did say "no doubt the bloke should be in jail but 10 years given the context???"
Thoughts? I think its pretty disgraceful but interested to hear what people think.