Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

David Walliams

699 replies

mrpenny · 10/11/2026 12:16

To Think it could not have been DW??

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Bundleflower · Yesterday 11:57

WitchesBritches · Yesterday 08:34

Exactly. Disgusting.

Get a grip. You seem more concerned that I simply stated I think he’ll promptly go through with his well-publicised & narcissistic threat to try and control the narrative than anything else on this thread. I’ve not said anything out of line. Perhaps if he hadn’t behaved this way this could all be avoided and he wouldn’t be making such awful threats?

LBFseBrom · Yesterday 12:16

We don't yet know if David Walliams has actually done anything, so far it's just rumours.

Scarcityvarcity · Yesterday 12:23

LBFseBrom · Yesterday 12:16

We don't yet know if David Walliams has actually done anything, so far it's just rumours.

You obviously haven't read the newspapers.

Firesidechatter · Yesterday 12:26

LBFseBrom · Yesterday 12:16

We don't yet know if David Walliams has actually done anything, so far it's just rumours.

I think the word you mean is allegations. Not rumours.

Bundleflower · Yesterday 12:30

LBFseBrom · Yesterday 12:16

We don't yet know if David Walliams has actually done anything, so far it's just rumours.

Allegations, yes. But the fact he took it to the high court to try and silence the press is suspect. There’s also a lot that’s come out in the newspapers. A bit like a woman that Price Andrew had never met having a settlement of millions of pounds…

Namechange5684 · Yesterday 13:01

ohyesiseethatnow · 10/11/2026 16:47

yes this is how I feel.

No matter how much awareness there is, and how many predators like Brand are jailed, men are always going to be attracted to younger women. And if the law says the age of consent is 16 and these men target women at 17, 18, then what? It may be distasteful but it not illegal.

Moreover, the story of the 20 year old photographer paints a particularly tragic story of DW. He clearly wanted a serious relationship, which she admits. He wasn’t “after one thing”. He did introduce her to people to help with her photography. She latterly viewed this as an abuse of power, presumably as he wanted something in return. Which he didn’t get. I kind of feel like he was in a no win situation. Famous, powerful man with ability to help career of younger woman he seeks relationship with. He helps: it’s seen as transactional / manipulative. He doesn’t help, he’s seen as an arsehole who refuses
to help.

Likewise the women at Harper Collins. They were in their 20s and he was looking for a relationship. I feel people are saying he could only approach his financial equals, which would be a very small pool.

Also the girl in the article who says her and some friends were alone in a dressing room with him. 13, 14, and 16 year olds I think. And she’s angry and thinks this should never have been allowed to happen, which I don’t disagree with. But…..nothing happened. He didn’t do anything.

I’m the first to admit he’s creepy and I’ve certainly never been a fan. But I expected much, much worse.

Maybe there is worse to come, I don’t know. But I just feel like people had psyched themselves up for this so much that they feel they need to pounce and carry through with his lynching…..when really what has been revealed is fairly tame.

(except for the story of the 15 year old.)

The wannabe photographer was 18 and extremely vulnerable. As a child, she was in care and at the time of meeting DW, became homeless. He suggested she move in as he had a spare bed. On arriving, there was no spare bed and the expectation was for her to share his.

She slept on the sofa for a few days and during the time she was there, he was constantly pestering her to share his bed, "pawed" at her, stroked her legs and laid his head in her lap.

She says that when she didn't give in, he became moody and cold and she felt scared for her safety so left to sleep on a friend's floor.

Yes, very pathetic but also extremely chilling and predatory.

ETA photo: Does this look like an innocuous "serious relationship" attempt?

fridakahlosmoustache · Yesterday 13:04

He suggested she move in as he had a spare bed. On arriving, there was no spare bed and the expectation was for her to share his.

Ugh. We've all met this guy.

trythisforsize · Yesterday 13:10

There is absolutely no valid reason to have young teenage girls in your dressing room - no matter who you are.

If you are hiding behind the excuse that it was just 'fans' - why weren't adult men and women regularly in his dressing room.

It's clear why they were there. To stroke his warped ego.

Namechange5684 · Yesterday 13:13

Namechange5684 · Yesterday 13:01

The wannabe photographer was 18 and extremely vulnerable. As a child, she was in care and at the time of meeting DW, became homeless. He suggested she move in as he had a spare bed. On arriving, there was no spare bed and the expectation was for her to share his.

She slept on the sofa for a few days and during the time she was there, he was constantly pestering her to share his bed, "pawed" at her, stroked her legs and laid his head in her lap.

She says that when she didn't give in, he became moody and cold and she felt scared for her safety so left to sleep on a friend's floor.

Yes, very pathetic but also extremely chilling and predatory.

ETA photo: Does this look like an innocuous "serious relationship" attempt?

Edited

Photo now added.

David Walliams
nicepotoftea · Yesterday 13:18

They were in their 20s and he was looking for a relationship.

Why not look for a relationship with somebody of his own generation?

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 13:19

From the photo he appears to have had male friends who were his own age.

MrDirtyBear · Yesterday 13:21

Namechange5684 · Yesterday 13:13

Photo now added.

What strikes me every time I see that picture is "Ross didn't know", he says.

All he had to do was turn around and the context for the "joke" would have been obvious.

Are we to believe he didn't turn around?

And Gervais? Fearlessly attacked Hollywood, yet chickened out back home?

Getsomemeatonyerbones · Yesterday 13:30

DancingonmyOwn88 · Yesterday 00:17

That is a carefully honed act, perfected over many years.

Do you really think so?

Perhaps pedo's have a certain look?

Getsomemeatonyerbones · Yesterday 13:31

Koalacanth · Yesterday 00:33

I wonder if Simon Cowell had any idea Walliams was behaving so badly.

There is something v odd about him
to me! I really wonder about him

Getsomemeatonyerbones · Yesterday 13:32

fridakahlosmoustache · Yesterday 00:44

He always set of my creepometer big time. Glad to be vindicated (though I expected it to be young boys).

Yes, I also expected it to be boys

Getsomemeatonyerbones · Yesterday 13:34

fridakahlosmoustache · Yesterday 00:46

On wiki, it quotes him as saying he's bi.

So strange....

Getsomemeatonyerbones · Yesterday 13:35

Datingwoess · Yesterday 01:09

Anyone think Simon C is next?

Something fishy..but in which direction not sure

Getsomemeatonyerbones · Yesterday 13:39

RaspberryCoffeePot · Yesterday 02:30

Why ? as a matter of interest. I've always thought he's a bit of a show off and big mouth and probably wanted to appear to be one of the lads, but I've never thought of him as a predator. He seems to have a wife and family that he is devoted to.

Ive never got a vibe off him or the bake off one, but who knows

mumumental · Yesterday 13:52

Scarcityvarcity · Yesterday 11:57

I think something should be done about NDAs too as these seemed to be abused. Perhaps if a famous person wants someone to sign one they should also have to pay for a solicitor to advise the person being asked to sign.

I don’t like them altogether. There’s always a built in legal obligation on the person signing to hide things, very often dodgy stuff. Those not signing are usually disadvantaged, in more ways than one. That said, I’m sure there are commercial in confidence reasons sometimes, but they shouldn’t be use to hide bad be. CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development) also says this.

Sladuf1 · Yesterday 14:00

Sartre · 10/11/2026 19:38

Let’s not forget the fact he went down the mental health route when he was removed from BGT as well. It appears to be a running theme with him when things go wrong. He thinks if he threatens to kill himself, people will leave him alone.

I hope schools remove his shit books. He only had one decent story anyway, Gangsta Granny. He was a Temu Roald Dahl.

Didn’t know about that. Reminds me of a time when one of the worst narcissists I’ve ever known tried that on with my mother. I think people are right to be cynical on this occasion.

PropertyD · Yesterday 14:04

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 13:18

They were in their 20s and he was looking for a relationship.

Why not look for a relationship with somebody of his own generation?

That is complete rubbish. What are you going to do ban relationships if there is XXX age gap. You couldnt police this.

I had a realtionship when I was 19 with someone 17 years older than me. It was my choice to do this and whilst it ended I dont think I need to say I was vunerable and didnt really know what I was doing

UnaPersson · Yesterday 14:18

Namechange5684 · Yesterday 13:13

Photo now added.

She looks like a hostage. 😬

Stratosphericcloud · Yesterday 14:19

Prince Andrew
Philip Schofield
Hugh Edwards
Russell Brand
And now allegedly David Walliams.

Their entitlement is off the charts. They all behaved as if only their feelings matter and they all use mental health as an excuse when found out, from sex addiction, to stress, to depression.

It’s an established pattern and one thankfully we all recognise now but we need to get a hell of a lot better at stopping it from the outset.

These cases are known about because of the celebrity status of the men involved but there are hundreds of other similar individuals, usually males, in the work place, in a police force, or army regiment, at the sports club, in a church, or school, taking advantage of their superior status right now who need to be called out and in the majority of cases it needs to be other men of similar status policing this.

nicepotoftea · Yesterday 14:20

PropertyD · Yesterday 14:04

That is complete rubbish. What are you going to do ban relationships if there is XXX age gap. You couldnt police this.

I had a realtionship when I was 19 with someone 17 years older than me. It was my choice to do this and whilst it ended I dont think I need to say I was vunerable and didnt really know what I was doing

I'm making a character judgement not suggesting legislation.

I'm happy to accept that sometimes large age gaps work, but if there is a pattern of repeatedly seeking out and then ditching much younger girls and women, he isn't interested in their unique personality.

Lookatheskies · Yesterday 14:28

It reminds me of Steve Coogan who wanted to go out with my friend who when she was 15 years old. Dread to think who else he tried it on with.

Swipe left for the next trending thread