Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Inheritance

104 replies

Sillyme1 · 22/09/2026 21:05

Am I being unreasonable to feel that adult children who do nothing to support elderly parents, do not ring, even when said elderly parents are I hospital, they cannot expect to receive an inheritance when said parents die?

OP posts:
noworklifebalance · 09/11/2026 06:20

CherryKerry · 08/11/2026 23:38

No one should expect inheritance and equally, no one should be obliged to care for an elderly relative.

The latter is not that straightforward if they have moved into your home and subsequently their care needs change - you cannot make them move to a care home or nursing home against their consent so you become their default carer/provider, even if you arrange for external carers to attend, as you obvious can’t just ignore or not consider them.

BCBird · 09/11/2026 06:56

Even though this might seem fair to not receive anything, it often happens that money is split equally. I would like to think in my family if this situation had ever arisen the person who was absent would decline the money. Realistically in most families this wouldn't happen.

JasmineMac · 09/11/2026 08:55

TraitorOrFaithful · 09/11/2026 05:31

I know that my parents have split everything equally between me and my brother in their wills. They don't need care yet, but they're in their mid to late 80s so that may change at some point. I would not expect them to disinherit either me or my brother if we aren't closely involved in their care. In my case, I work full time, have teenage DC and live over an hour away, so it will be difficult to be there for them as much as I'd like to be. However, I guess our inheritance will be reduced if they use it to pay for care, which is obviously fair enough.

It's interesting that people consider it entirely acceptable that state provided care comes at a cost (and it's an incredibly high cost, for what is largely impersonal care) but family provided care should come at no cost. And it's generally always people who don't provide any care, or have no intention of providing any care, who hold that viewpoint...

With an ageing population, attitudes to unpaid carers really does need to change. The attitude that someone else, a sibling for example, should provide all of your parents' care entirely out of the goodness of their heart is actually, in my opinion, an incredibly selfish attitude. Being a primary care giver for an elderly dependent is a bloody hard road to hoe! It's not just about practical expenses either, the cost to your own mental/emotional wellbeing can be huge. Some people spend decades providing acute care and support for their parents.

I sense a shift in both government and local authority thinking on this. Of course it suits the powers that be to have family provide all care, because it means no cost to the public purse. Unpaid carers however are finding their voices, and seeking the recognition they bloody deserve.

BusyGreySnail · 09/11/2026 09:01

It always surprises me how acceptable it seems to be to just forget about elderly parents entirely. Noone is saying that you need to see your parents every day, but maintaining contact with them in a way that you would with anyone you loved and shared a meaningful relationship with is not an unreasonable expectation in my view.

I agree noone should expect inheritance. I also think it's very out of order to cut someone off for minor things. BUT if an adult doesn't bother at all with their parents in their later years then I don't think it's unfair for the parents to reflect that there is no relationship there in their will.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread