Helen Webberley concludes she issued many falsehoods in a recent debate with Kellie-Jay Keen

[TheyAreLovelyLovelyPeople]

ripx4nutmeg on X: "Gender doctor Helen Webberley has fact checked - HERSELF - from her recent debate with Kellie-Jay Keen and concluded that she (Helen Webberley) issued numerous falsehoods https://t.co/GKSmvmaBys" / X

Blimey.

Wow! Interesting that she's bothered to do this. Paranoid about future legql action perhaps?

Something triggered her moment of clarity. Legal action or bang to the head?

It is odd behaviour from her. Out of character.

Didn’t see that coming.

Does everyone get a CT scan before having their appendix out?

Does she even know it's there or has she just let AI populate the website without reading it

Do you there anywhere else to open the screen shot?

https://www.helenwebberley.com/insights/trigonometry-trans-debate-claims-evidence

Weird Sammy Chatbot thing:

Q: Did Helen Webberley get things wrong in the debate?

A: Yes, and I think it matters to say so plainly. A few things I said were overstated, and one or two were simply inaccurate. The claim about misgendering being a hate crime was legally wrong. The appendicectomy figure I used was out of date. Saying nobody has ever been able to get puberty blockers in the UK was too strong. I've tried to correct all of it here, because the rest of what I said is only worth anything if I'm honest about the bits that weren't right. What part of the debate are you most curious about?

Surely she should be praised for doing this? If only KJK had the same decency.

Praised? For admitting she mainly talks shite?

Slow hand clap for Helen.

Is this the 'sensible GC' position?

I think you’ll find it’s the “I’m as GC as they come, but…” position

Please explain what you mean by this? Surely you're not just trying to make a dig, JanesLittleGirl?

I'm not at all switched on to AI technology but looking at that website it all seems to have been written by AI and the amount of content being churned out on a daily basis is more than I could read in a day.

Is it possible that she didn't know that summary was there and it was AI writing what it thought would be an interesting article after someone asked the chatbot about the accuracy of her claims?

The chatbot shuts down if you ask it a negative Helen question, so either the site was hacked, or she put that particular content out there on purpose.

Au contraire. You have positioned yourself as someone who, by being sensible, criticises many of us for being overly confrontational or otherwise denying the opportunity for dialogue with those who aren't GC. I don't see how your post reflects this approach.

I listened to this podcast. Webberley repeatedly claimed that KJK could not state anything about the topic as she was not medically trained. Seems Webberley although medically trained is not medically accurate?

Wasn't there criticism of Gender GP for perusing AI to answer patient queries? This whatnot might be one trained by GGP?www.reddit.com/r/GenderGP/comments/1b0kqlh/confirmed_that_gendergp_is_using_ai/#lightbox