Even in Ireland, which has similar gender laws as Australia, I've noticed that it's much more acceptable now to have discussions about women that clearly refer to biological women.
A couple of random examples -
I heard somebody on a sports programme saying that sports footwear should take into account that 'men's and women's bodies are different', and on another occasion that sports coaches must start factoring menstrual cycles into women's training programmes.
In the not-so-distant past, there would have been anguished corrections of the hate-fuelled suggestion that there are men, and there are women, and they are identifiably biologically distinct, and some kind of blabbering about inclusivity.
But these straightforward statements about sportswomen were just allowed to stand.
I've also noticed that a regular health and wellness radio programme has features on women's health which are very clearly about biological women's health.
I don't listen to it but it's often on in the background, and the word 'vulva' coming from the radio stopped me in my tracks a couple of weeks ago and made me pay close attention!
It was unequivocally about real women and real vulvas with not even a hint of apology or squirming to include 'our trans sisters' or anything like that.
It's as if the whole trans/genderID/TWAW thing never really took root in the minds of the general public, and biological realism is reasserting itself in everyday life.
It's like a coat of paint that was badly applied, and is wearing off in patches now.