Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

US government report reveals mass insurance fraud in the gender change industry

40 replies

fromorbit · 14/08/2026 09:32

Big news. The extent of this is appalling, but not surprising. With WPATH admitting its ideas have no basis the foundations behind the huge gender medical industry in the US is imploding.

HHS Releases Report Exposing Fraudulent Insurance Coding For Sex-rejecting Procedures On Minors

WASHINGTON, D.C. — August 13, 2026 — The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today released a report Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of “Gender Medicine,” a commissioned report examining insurance coding practices, perverse financial incentives, and the provision of sex-rejecting procedures for minors. Drawing on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Guidance, Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations, peer-reviewed scientific literature, hospital records, whistleblower testimony, nationwide insurance claims analyses, and interviews with patients and parents, the report presents HHS’ findings and recommendations about the industry pushing and profiting off so-called “gender medicine.” A shortform documentary illustrating the report’s findings and highlighting the stories of victims of predatory gender medical practices was also released in conjunction with the report.According to the report, more than 225 hospitals and health systems established pediatric gender programs nationwide. The report also analyzes nationwide claims data from 2015 through 2025 and identifies approximately $50 million in insurance claims for puberty blockers billed using endocrine disorder diagnostic code E34.9 (Endocrine Disorder, Unspecified). It further reports that nearly $11 million in claims for patients ages 13–17 were billed using a diagnosis code for precocious puberty E301 — findings the report says warrant additional review of insurance coding practices.
https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-report-insurance-coding-sex-rejecting-procedures-minors.html

This could have global impacts in the fight against this awful practice.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/08/2026 23:13

Bump

GrumpyPanda · 15/08/2026 01:40

The US is not the only country to have experienced insurance shenanigans in this area. Earlier this year, the vice chair of the German Chamber of Psychotherapists, Sabine Maur, had to resign after video emerged of a training session in which she had advised participants to hide patients' "non-binary" status, which under current rules would make them ineligible for reimbursement.

https://queernations.de/video-leak-sabine-maur/

Sabine Maur

Nach Video-Leak und Gerichtsurteil: Sabine Maur tritt von Spitzenämtern zurück - Initiative Queer Nations

Ein geleaktes Fortbildungsvideo und ein verlorener Rechtsstreit: Die Psychotherapeutin Sabine Maur tritt von ihren Spitzenämtern in der

https://queernations.de/video-leak-sabine-maur

Persephonia1966 · 15/08/2026 02:20

MyThreeWords · 14/08/2026 18:24

It seems to be a separate report, Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices, for which some evidence of peer review is provided, rather than the (rather emotively titled) Wolves in White Coats.

It is horrible not to be able to take govt reports at face value, but I do feel this one might owe at least something to the US govt's culture war, anti-trans, co-opting of legitimate concerns around "gender affirming" medicine. That doesn't detract from any evidence-based claims that it makes, but it will affect the the reception of it, and the possibility of progress.

Yes, the good thing about the UK Cass report was that it was about as unbiased as could be really, it was always going to cause controversy matter what the conclusion because it was such a politicised topic. And regardless of "sides" it's always a disaster when medicine gets politicised. But in the US there doesn't even seem to be any desire to depoliticise the debate or seek any bi-partisan approach. Which makes it easier for both.sides to just ignore evidence they don't like.

SmudgeBrown · 15/08/2026 18:48

BettyFilous · 14/08/2026 12:56

Great analogy. I had not considered the heft of the health insurance industry up against big pharma. It could get messy.

Some lawyers have been warning that the insurance industry will be what brings it all down in the end. Eventually, no insurer is going to take the risk of backing trans ‘healthcare’, and those who have been fraudulently billed will be after blood.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 15/08/2026 19:11

Persephonia1966 · 15/08/2026 02:20

Yes, the good thing about the UK Cass report was that it was about as unbiased as could be really, it was always going to cause controversy matter what the conclusion because it was such a politicised topic. And regardless of "sides" it's always a disaster when medicine gets politicised. But in the US there doesn't even seem to be any desire to depoliticise the debate or seek any bi-partisan approach. Which makes it easier for both.sides to just ignore evidence they don't like.

Healthcare/insurance is one of the Top Three for politics in the US, along with immigration and the economy. It will never not be a political football because there's too much money in it.

GarlicAnywhere · 15/08/2026 20:14

Boiledbeetle · 14/08/2026 10:49

I feel so sad for the young adults in the accompanying video to the report. What was done to them as children is horrifying.

I like their consistent use of sex-rejecting procedures in place of whiffly euphemisms like trans healthcare, gender affirming care and the rest of it.

Datun · 15/08/2026 20:25

GarlicAnywhere · 15/08/2026 20:14

I like their consistent use of sex-rejecting procedures in place of whiffly euphemisms like trans healthcare, gender affirming care and the rest of it.

Yeah. They've totally wised up to the linguistic shenanigans

fromorbit · 16/08/2026 14:21

MyThreeWords · 14/08/2026 18:24

It seems to be a separate report, Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices, for which some evidence of peer review is provided, rather than the (rather emotively titled) Wolves in White Coats.

It is horrible not to be able to take govt reports at face value, but I do feel this one might owe at least something to the US govt's culture war, anti-trans, co-opting of legitimate concerns around "gender affirming" medicine. That doesn't detract from any evidence-based claims that it makes, but it will affect the the reception of it, and the possibility of progress.

Yes partisan politics will have an effect on how this news spreads.

Yet that won't affect the implications in other ways. The Trans Industry was about ideology, but more than that it was about MONEY. Multi Millions were being made. It was profitable.

With this info about insurance fraud and the ongoing collapse in WPATH's influence the law suits are coming in a big way. There will be a lot of money to be made taking BIg Gender down.

It won't matter what the Democrats think or do. Anymore than the politicians who backed Big Tobacco could do much to stop the law suits once the evidence was out and they really started.

Even if the Dems win the White House states and individuals now have the evidence they need to sue gender clinics into oblivion. Every case they win gives more evidence.

It was all lies told to make money. Now there is money to be made in taking it down. That matters.

OP posts:
Mountainlarch · 17/08/2026 16:05

I have read a bit of the report. While it was commissioned by the Trump administration, my impression is that the report was witten by independent investigators, although skeptical of the "gender affirmation" model. Parts of the fraud are crystal clear, e.g. the number of children that had a diagnosis of precocious puberty despite being 13 years old and older! From my understanding, this was done for several reasons, e.g. some insurance companies do not pay for these treatments if the diagnosis is gender dysphorya, or for the states where pediatric treatments got banned in the previous years.
Although I'm not familiar with the US system, I'm surprised there wasn't more pushback from insurance companies - may it's a stereotype from movies, it I had the impression that, if they can avoid to pay, they'll do their best!!

PriOn1 · 17/08/2026 16:25

I hope this is a sign of the final collapse of this scam. It can’t come too soon. I have long believed this will be the only thing that blows the whole ideology apart.

I hope it’s not just about fraudulent claims though. Then it can be argued there’s nothing wrong with the procedure, it’s just the billing that’s problematic.

Mountainlarch · 18/08/2026 21:33

I was waiting for one of the journalists I trust to write about the HHS report, this is from Bernard Lane, an Australian journalist who's always very factual. While it's not a deep dive into it, it touches on the salient facts. More news from other countries, too. https://www.genderclinicnews.com/p/signs-and-symptoms-of-fraud

Signs and symptoms of fraud

Plus: Medicaid tap turns off; ROGD birthday; WPATH fesses up; Trans safetyism in Oz; Germany's outlier guideline; reviving Watchful Waiting; Canada's data hole; Cass inconsistency; Singapore update

https://www.genderclinicnews.com/p/signs-and-symptoms-of-fraud

Mountainlarch · 18/08/2026 21:37

It's also interesting that there will be new ICD codes for detransitiom.
https://donoharmmedicine.org/2026/08/13/why-the-cdcs-new-icd-10-codes-matter-for-detransitioners/

UtopiaPlanitia · 20/08/2026 17:24

Mountainlarch · 18/08/2026 21:37

It's also interesting that there will be new ICD codes for detransitiom.
https://donoharmmedicine.org/2026/08/13/why-the-cdcs-new-icd-10-codes-matter-for-detransitioners/

About bloody time - detransitioners have been largely abandoned by genderist medics/clinics so I hope this report and these changes will lead to them receiving better health care from now on.

fromorbit · 20/08/2026 18:01

Anyone interested in what is happening in the US keep an eye on the Sophie Cunningham thread. The amount of insanity going on in the WBNA is reminiscent of the initial anti JKR stuff only in 2026 the narrative really can't hold.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5558154-us-womens-sports-star-sophie-cunningham-speaking-up-on-defending-womens-sports?page=10&reply=154253978

The news on insurance fraud and WPATH is vital legally, but the gender madness is crashing against the reality of women's sport is what really is catching the public eye. Huge increase in viewing figures and merchandise sales.

Page 10 | US women’s sports star Sophie Cunningham speaking up on defending women's sports | Mumsnet

Big development. In the US few big women's sports stars have dared to speak up in the defence of women having sports. Lots of coverage of this going v...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5558154-us-womens-sports-star-sophie-cunningham-speaking-up-on-defending-womens-sports?page=10&reply=154253978

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page