Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 26/07/2026 09:01

I was thinking that NHS Scotland rely on funding from Westminster, so if the new Health Secretary meant what he said about obeying the law, he should withhold funding until NHSS develop policies that reflect the law. Then I remembered that there's been a regime change and the new, new HS is Yvette Cooper, so bang goes that idea. 😠

BiologicalRobot · 26/07/2026 09:10

It's about time the people who decide that the company/public body should break the law be prosecuted. There is no point taking NHS Scotland to court when it has deep pockets. Who is deciding on following this illegal path? Is it the board of directors, their lawyers or their diversity department? Name and fucking shame the individuals.

I also agree with pp. We need to stop centering the me, me, me crew as it is the attention they are after just like toddlers. No thought or decent arguments are behind the majority of the posts anymore.

Gengha · 26/07/2026 09:15

MashaPav · 25/07/2026 22:23

The UK is a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, if the ECHR rules that a UK law or Supreme Court decision violates human rights, the UK is bound by international treaty to address it. They can issue a "declaration of incompatibility," which generally pressures Parliament to change the law.

But UK law isn’t against the ECHR. UKSC addressed these issues in their judgment. It may surprise you to know that women as well as men who claim to be women have rights too and UK law is allowed to recognise that fact. There’s no human right to expect to be treated as the opposite sex in all circumstances

Hoardasurass · 26/07/2026 09:42

MashaPav · 25/07/2026 22:23

The UK is a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, if the ECHR rules that a UK law or Supreme Court decision violates human rights, the UK is bound by international treaty to address it. They can issue a "declaration of incompatibility," which generally pressures Parliament to change the law.

The ECrtHR does not have the power to overturn UK law or rulings nor can it force a sovereign nation to change their laws.
The supreme court rulling was already tested in FWS vs SPS where the SPS put forward human rights claims of trans identifying males under articles 2 and 8. The SPS had their arses handed to them it is not a human right to use opposite sex spaces or facilities and women have human rights too.

the ECrtHR have recently refused to get involved in multiple "trans rights" cases that have failed in the UK supreme crt including the American man who wanted to force the uk to recognise nonbinary gender and allow passports and birth certificates to be issued with an X and the woman with a GRC who wanted to be registered as her children's father on their birth certificates.

Even the multiple attempts to have the ECHR lose its A rating failed.

You really need to understand that the time of trans activists being able to bully, lie, misrepresent the law and use threats of a higher crt are over. Women have human rights too and everybody now knows that women's human rights are incompatible with the demands of trans activists.

your only way forward now is with primary legislation that strips women of all their human rights and you will have to campaign for that and explain why the wants of trans identifying males should override the need of women and girls not to have grown men in their single sex spaces.

Gengha · 26/07/2026 10:14

Hoardasurass · 26/07/2026 09:42

The ECrtHR does not have the power to overturn UK law or rulings nor can it force a sovereign nation to change their laws.
The supreme court rulling was already tested in FWS vs SPS where the SPS put forward human rights claims of trans identifying males under articles 2 and 8. The SPS had their arses handed to them it is not a human right to use opposite sex spaces or facilities and women have human rights too.

the ECrtHR have recently refused to get involved in multiple "trans rights" cases that have failed in the UK supreme crt including the American man who wanted to force the uk to recognise nonbinary gender and allow passports and birth certificates to be issued with an X and the woman with a GRC who wanted to be registered as her children's father on their birth certificates.

Even the multiple attempts to have the ECHR lose its A rating failed.

You really need to understand that the time of trans activists being able to bully, lie, misrepresent the law and use threats of a higher crt are over. Women have human rights too and everybody now knows that women's human rights are incompatible with the demands of trans activists.

your only way forward now is with primary legislation that strips women of all their human rights and you will have to campaign for that and explain why the wants of trans identifying males should override the need of women and girls not to have grown men in their single sex spaces.

Correct. The UK government has disregarded ECHR rulings before. The world hasn’t ended. UK law has primacy over ECHR law. This was different to EU law which did have primacy

1984Now · 26/07/2026 10:18

Gengha · 26/07/2026 10:14

Correct. The UK government has disregarded ECHR rulings before. The world hasn’t ended. UK law has primacy over ECHR law. This was different to EU law which did have primacy

One of the interesting things in the illegal migrants debate.
UK law has primacy, we could choose to deport illegals and foreign criminals without leaving the ECHR.

Hoardasurass · 26/07/2026 10:19

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 26/07/2026 09:01

I was thinking that NHS Scotland rely on funding from Westminster, so if the new Health Secretary meant what he said about obeying the law, he should withhold funding until NHSS develop policies that reflect the law. Then I remembered that there's been a regime change and the new, new HS is Yvette Cooper, so bang goes that idea. 😠

The NHS is devolved in Scotland and under SNP control unfortunately

Womanofcustard · 26/07/2026 10:39

I expect we’ll see more of Masha now the school holidays have begun!

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 26/07/2026 10:48

Hoardasurass · 26/07/2026 10:19

The NHS is devolved in Scotland and under SNP control unfortunately

The running of it might be but the funding isn't.

L353A1 · 26/07/2026 12:32

Imdunfer · 26/07/2026 08:22

If the ECHR overturn the supreme court ruling then the next government will take us out of the ECHR quicker than a rat up a drainpipe.

Edited

The ECtHR has no power to overturn rulings of the UK Supreme Court. That's not how it works. In the UK Parliament is supreme. If the UK is found to be in breach of her commitments under the European convention a document of discrepancy is drawn up and passed to government, which is then expected to draw up legislation to fix the problem. The ECtHR has to power to enforce this.

I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

1984Now · 26/07/2026 12:45

I always think with the blundering interjections of so many TIMs or other trans allies on this site, that it's like men in women's toilets.
They wander in, creating their local chaos, and then bugger off again.
I remain impressed the women here calmly argue their way past the disruption.
It's like local performative art, gives these no marks something to cackle about collectively on Reddit Trans.

SidewaysOtter · 26/07/2026 13:22

1984Now · 25/07/2026 22:33

They won't do it, and no lawyer would dare risk the humiliation of attempting it. But why don't you set up a crowd funder with your little friends and have a go yourself.
We'll be here for you when you lose.

If only there was some sort of campaigning legal group who would be able to run a crowd funder...

You never know, they might just do us all a favour like when they confirmed the FWS ruling!

Hoardasurass · 26/07/2026 14:05

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 26/07/2026 10:48

The running of it might be but the funding isn't.

Yes it is.
What the Scottish government spends on NHSS is entirely up to the Scottish government and even when they get extra due to an uplift given to NHS England they don't have to spend it on the NHS

New posts on this thread. Refresh page