Knotty,
I thought others might be interested in different points of view. I have also reposted your original link to Sex Matters info on the consultation so that it wouldn't get buried, and readers would be able to access it and respond. I'm not trying to convince anyone not to complete the consultation, but I don't think anyone should just fill it out the way Sex Matters wants them to. People can think for themselves.
Your argument is that because some women cant meet the burden of proof, that those who already do shouldn’t get digital ID. It’s an odd argument tbh because it doesn’t really matter if the ID is digital or not - some people have reliable ID and some dont. So no one will be worse off than they already are.
ok, I take your point, but I was mainly arguing that women shouldn't need id to prove we are women. I still believe that..
I don't use AI, in fact I don't know how to use AI. Everything I wrote was what I genuinely believe, and I definitely am not writing this for the benefit of men. What a bizarre thing to assume, just because someone has a different opinion on how we should be approaching the threats to women's spaces. I really care about this and have a family member caught up in it as well.
I've read your posts for years, followed your work on the NHS audit, so I'm sorry you feel I'm pulling for the " other team" - well, I guess that's just the way it goes online.. You don't know me, I don't know you, whatever.
Sorry for taking up so much of your thread.. I'll leave it there, doubt anyone is reading it anyway.