Oh hooray.
It was total dereliction of duty of care. Knowingly, intentionally. To prove a stupid political performed belief that these men are some kind of woman. With full intention that the risk to women should be handwaved away. While still maintaining the obviously belief that men and women should be housed in separate prisons because of risk to women.
The SCJ laid the path for this.
In court it will be found: they are men. There are no circumstances in which they are not.
There is no bar for these men: there is no way to separate this group from any other men.
Women's safety and rights were compromised to further a political conceit. From a male dominated govt with a long track record of misogyny and sexism.
It won't remove the damage and trauma from the women, but compensation would help. And the dragging of it through the papers and the public costs will concentrate more minds wonderfully.