Link re trans ally childcare’s abuse pics

[caramac04]

Trans Ally distributing pics child sex abuse

At this point surely everyone knows this is a feature not a bug with these allies

https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/05/31/neo-nazi-who-targeted-drag-queen-story-hours-charged-with-possession-of-child-pornography/

A man who is reportedly a member of right-wing hate group that disrupts Drag Queen Story Hours has been charged with the possession of ch*ld pornography.

Stephen Thomas Farrea – reportedly a member of the Nationalist Social Club (NSC), a group which refers to drag queens as “pedo scum” – was arrested

The problem is men, Chris. Men. This is why we don't want them (any of them) in our single sex female spaces.

Giving a pass to those men who claim to be allies of gender ideology doesn't change the fact that some of them will still commit violent sexual offences. See also: Neil Gaimon. It seems that creating a sacred caste around anything attracts sexual predators like flies to shit.

I'm equally horrified (but unsurprised) by the story you countered with (I presume as some sort of 'gotcha'). It's not really a gotcha btw. Just another example of a shitty man. Frankly, that's the feature, not the bug. Regardless of whether they are a left wing man or a right wing man.

The point is pedos are pedos, they exist on all sides of the political spectrum.

I see an agenda being pushed that only people who are trans or trans-supportive could be sex offenders (which is just recycled homophobia from the 90s when people were saying the exact same thing about gay men). The far right and gender critical activists are rather quiet when someone from their side is caught.

Also the past week or two re the Grok CSAM and revenge porn scandal has been interesting. Interesting to see who is defending EM and who is calling him out. The users on Twitter defending him and saying stupid stuff like "make pencil and paper illegal too!" seem to be mostly blue ticks (who may also be anti-immigration and gender critical activists). Nigel Farage was smirking in Parliament when Kier Starmer spoke of his concerns about what how Grok was able and willing to comply with requests to make non-consensual sexual images of people (and make them publicly available on Twitter, since Grok is built-in).

Because the problem is men is the reason women don’t want any men in women’s spaces. That includes men who identify as women.

Thats not the narrative that we are pushing.
Yes there are bad men on all sides however many of them are massively pro trans as it allows them access to potential victims due to their sacred cast.
Have you never stopped to ask yourself why so many sex offenders self-id as transwomen on arrest, conviction or entering prison @Christinapple

He's here again. I'm off

It is genuinely amusing that you thought that was a gotcha @Christinapple

TRAs love to try and play a tit-for-tat game.

All it does it reinforce the fact that many men are dangerous and that's why women don't want them in their spaces. Whatever the political persuasion or beliefs of the man.

Did you mean to strengthen our case? Because you just have, spectacularly.

This demonstrates such a worrying lack of critical thinking.

I see an agenda being pushed that only people who are trans or trans-supportive could be sex offenders - Nobody is saying this. The evidenced argument is that it's overwhelmingly men who are sex offenders. And trans identifying males are men.

The far right and gender critical activists are rather quiet when someone from their side is caught - Not at all. Plenty of gender critical posters on here and people in real life call this behaviour out, loudly and consistently. I can't speak for the far right because I'm not part of it.

Also the past week or two re the Grok CSAM and revenge porn scandal has been interesting. Interesting to see who is defending EM and who is calling him out (+ some blurb about Farage...) - Yes it is interesting isn't it? I'm glad you agree. It is rather an immature mindset though that believes "my enemy's enemy is my friend". GC posters on here are good at NOT doing that. We don't automatically assume that anyone is on our "side". We don't see the world in black and white, good and evil. It's the TRAs that like to push that narrative and cause division.

Here's another gender critical activist example from a couple of days ago

https://x.com/MxVivianWulf/status/2011794947171553452

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/disgraced-state-rep-rj-may-seeks-reduced-sentence-so-he-can-live-on-family-farm/ar-AA1U8EcR

Fantastic, thanks Chris! More proof that many men are sex offenders and shouldn't be allowed in women's spaces. And that you can't tell by looking at them who the dangerous ones are.

You do our work for us! 👏

My line on this is always men need to obey the law.

why do men have such a problem with the word no?

any paedophile is disgusting and should be punished to the full
extent of the law regardless of how they identify.

I see an agenda being pushed that only people who are trans or trans-supportive could be sex offenders (which is just recycled homophobia from the 90s when people were saying the exact same thing about gay men). The far right and gender critical activists are rather quiet when someone from their side is caught.

Maybe some are punting for political advantage but, without doubt, very nasty people have jumped through the gaping chasms left after sex based rights and boundaries have been blown to bits.

The gay and trans community stood by, without ever speaking out to the obvious harm that came with that.

So - if the "good ones" are now caught in the cross hairs I say - and?

And you are completely wrong about this - (which is just recycled homophobia from the 90s when people were saying the exact same thing about gay men) - but I cannot be bothered to re-litigate that old chestnut.

Don’t worry, he won’t be around this thread for long - the more times Chris posts example of male sex offenders, the more he supports the argument that all men should be kept out of women’s single sex spaces

We dont care about the political or religious affiliations Chris, that’s kind of the point!

I'm waiting for the moment where Chris distances Chrisself from this author and from the Scottish drag queen nursery worker. Where Chris says oh no, these men are disgusting, what repulsive behaviour. How horrible for the victims.

I haven't seen it yet.

Christinapple

Does it never occur to you that loudly asserting quite how many men are sex offenders and paedophiles, in the same breath as advocating for women's spaces to be open to these men, is something of an own goal?

@Christinapple

I’m calling bullshit on the idea that anyone on MN has ever claimed:

only people who are trans or trans-supportive could be sex offenders

Let alone that it’s a common narrative.

There’s not much one can say with certainty about a place as large and diverse as MN, but this is as close as it gets. Utter black-is-white portrayal.

I see an agenda being pushed that only people who are trans or trans-supportive could be sex offenders

Bullshit. It is not possible you could believe this in good faith. You can only be making that claim to divert attention from the what people really say, which is that trans identifying and trans sympathising men are no less likely to be sex offenders then any other men.

Only someone whose mind has been so utterly rotted by the number of inconsistencies and falsehood they have to force themselves that is it no longer able to receive the real world could really believe what you stated, and I do not believe you are that far lost.

@Christinapple "(which is just recycled homophobia from the 90s when people were saying the exact same thing about gay men)."

No they weren't. What sort of circles were you moving in back then?

More proof that men should be kept out of women's spaces. (You do realise Transwomen are men, right?)