It's worth clicking through the link to read LaSota's disordered thoughts, where he writes about arguing with people about trans stuff.
"If I couldn’t convince her I wasn’t a man, hopefully I could get her to stop treating me like an aggressive pickup artist sexual marxist incel would-be-rapist future Elliot Rodger?"
*
"Retrospectively. Filtering out trans women who believe they are women is, by the normal definition, filtering out trans women. How many hiring decisions has Anna had a say in? CFAR has had <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221222125323/www.rationality.org/about/staff" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">almostt^ <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225124835/www.rationality.org/about/instructors" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">300^ employees, and no trans women. That is drastically below <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221226044200/www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10154078468809228" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">base rates in the Berkeley rationality communityy^."
*
"She randomly brought up, “but, I’m don’t know you wouldn’t use physical violence” (wd?). On hearing this, I noticed myself automatically desperately searching, how can I reassure her? Only obvious answer was, be more domesticated in general, like she kept <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203910/sinceriously.fyi/net-negative/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">pressingg^. <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203918/sinceriously.fyi/good-group-and-pasek's-doom" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">But that would be giving up everythingg^. And. This felt like a treadmill. I was already trying very hard to be TDT-principled, and I thought that was visible enough. Their thing had to be part of a strategy. Whoever was not part of the <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203826/sinceriously.fyi/glossary/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">default coalition of violencee^, to be treated as dangerous, regardless of the intentions, deontology, stance, policy, of whatever independent “state” they were a part of. This, going out of my way to be “verifiable” as Anna <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203910/sinceriously.fyi/net-negative/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">talked aboutt^… not that I particularly wanted to shift my foreign policy as an “independent state”, but this thing where I tried really hard to prevent even the possible prediction of me being violent from influencing things at all because that would be unfair/aggressive/evil wasn’t really working out for me, because people like Anna would cynically exploit it. I had been silent for a few seconds. Anna started to react, and I noticed my expression had shifted, and I was staring through her as I tended to do when my mind slipped into <a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203826/sinceriously.fyi/glossary/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the voidd^. Anna took on the tone of voice and gesturing of someone trying to quickly backtrack and erase something from the social record, saying, “No sorry I do know that.” (wd?)"
<a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203918/sinceriously.fyi/intersex-brains-and-conceptual-warfare/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20221225203918/sinceriously.fyi/intersex-brains-and-conceptual-warfare/