He's very clever (or thinks he is) with his legal arguments, philosophical asides and getting in all the TRA points.
I'm surprised he hasn't tried harder to think or sound like a woman, I mean in terms of a woman's point of view, even on the basics, like how a woman would feel about a man coming into the changing room, or NCs question about risk assessment when walking home alone - he couldn't even pretend to express that women would find this threatening, never mind that he would.
When asked about a "manly man" coming into the women's changing room, he was clearly thinking from
a) the point of view of that man
b) a purely theoretical point of view (and then going off into nebulous GI arguments)
He clearly never thought "as a woman" or even tried to put himself in the women's shoes.
This morning has been a stark clarification for me as to how very unlike a woman he thinks. And what he thinks of women.
My partner is a (manly!) man - he would immediately see what the issues are for women.
I think this is why many of us would rather encounter a regular man than an trans-identified man in any space.