Just catching up at lunch.
Was interested in this comment "DU I disagree that I'm male. Y'll have to ask them how they experienced me."
He knows he's male, otherwise he'd be a woman and not trans and this case wouldn't exist.
So he doesn't say "I'm not male" because that's a direct lie. He tries to lie more subtly with the misdirection "I disagree" as though it's a matter of opinion.
I would be terrified of being treated by this man, how can he be trusted to give proper treatment if he can't be directly truthful in a court?