I've just come across this account summarising the morning session - I'm assuming they've summarised other sessions. It looks accurate but caveat in that I've been busy elsewhere this morning so can't verify that fully.
https://x.com/boswelltoday/status/1888938860572201273?s=46
"Day 6 Morning Session – Dr Upton Admits Knowing Peggie Was Uncomfortable, But Carried On Anyway
Dr Upton faced intense cross-examination this morning, revealing a complete disregard for Sandy Peggie’s discomfort. Despite knowing that Peggie was uncomfortable sharing a changing room with a male, Upton continued using it anyway, insisting that her reaction was likely transphobic rather than a simple expectation of privacy.
When pressed on whether self-ID could allow any man into a female changing space, Upton struggled to justify the logic. Naomi Cunningham used the example of "Pete," a hypothetical male claiming to be a woman. Upton admitted that sincerity would be difficult to judge and that women in the changing room would have no way of knowing whether someone was genuine. Even so, Upton maintained that exclusion would be unfair, arguing that trans women should be allowed in female spaces regardless. In other words, women are expected to simply trust that any male in their space is there in good faith.
Upton also acknowledged that men commit violent and sexual crimes at a higher rate but resisted the idea that single-sex spaces exist for privacy and safeguarding rather than because all men are dangerous. Cunningham pointed out that maintaining female-only spaces does not imply that all men are predators, just as excluding trans women from them does not mean all trans women are threats. Still, Upton insisted that keeping trans women out of female-only spaces suggests a belief that a significant proportion of them are predators, an argument that completely dismisses the reality that these spaces are segregated on the basis of sex, not personal intent.
Perhaps most damning was Upton’s admission that they knew Peggie was uncomfortable yet continued using the space anyway. Tribunal evidence showed that Upton had previously sent messages noting that Peggie had left the room when they entered. When asked directly, Upton admitted they had inferred that she did not want to share a space with them. Rather than acknowledge the obvious—that a woman did not want to undress in front of a male—Upton assumed Peggie’s discomfort was based on hostility toward their trans status rather than a simple expectation of privacy. Cunningham pressed further, asking whether, despite knowing Peggie was uncomfortable, Upton had continued using the female changing room anyway. Upton’s response was a straightforward "yes."
This morning’s session made it abundantly clear that Upton had no formal permission to use the female changing room. They knew at least one female colleague was uncomfortable but dismissed her concerns as prejudice. And yet, it was Peggie who was suspended, not Upton. NHS Fife backed the male in the female changing room, not the woman who asked for privacy. The tribunal will continue this afternoon, but one thing is already clear—this case is exposing the disturbing priorities of an institution that should be safeguarding women, not punishing them for speaking up."