BBC, the WPATH files and Fergus Walsh, BBC Medical Editor

[MidsomerMurmurs]

Ever wondered why the BBC has not even mentioned the WPATH files?

https://x.com/JournalismSEEN/status/1806687754203332811

Not really surprising, but genuinely quite shocking to see this information laid out. The person who contacted Fergus Walsh (who then blocked this person’s email address) “‘is a former’ senior media professional”.

Interesting to note who Dr Véronique Walsh works for.

Wow, you’d think Walsh would be interested in a tip for a big health-related story.

Not on Twitter so can only see the first post, can anyone screenshot the others?

Why send to BBC? They hate women and enthralled to the trans activists, they won’t do anything.

Can anyone flesh out what Journalism SEEN has to say about this? For those not on Twitter, who DOES v. Dr. Walsh work for??

Gilead Sciences (really! what a name). Pharmaceutical company. Connections thoroughly explored in this thread: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5107581-fergus-walsh-bbc-medical-editor-and-a-trans-connection

Thanks Gasp.

Glinner has a new piece on his substack about this.
https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/gilead-and-the-bbc-a-marriage-made

I think this story is not going to go away.

Because whilst there is a compulsory licence fee the BBC should be covering these scandals like WPATH. They should also be impartial. Just because they don't and are not, doesn't mean we should let them off and give up.

Hte more I think about it, the more angry I get about Walsh and the BBC. Thank goodness for Hannah Barnes and Deb Cohen.

Our licence fee fell due six months ago. This sort of shit is why I didn't pay it.

We used to have an excellent national broadcaster. In the past. Once. Not now.