Fetishes, Paraphilias, the WHO and the Eunuchs.

[ArabellaScott]

https://reduxx.info/norwegian-bdsm-activist-behind-who-decision-to-remove-transvestic-fetishism-and-sadomasochism-from-psychiatric-diagnoses/

An extensive history of the men who campaigned to have paraphilias 'depathologised', reclassified in the ICD, including connections to the recently convicted 'Eunuch Maker'.

Did someone say 'mens sexual rights movement '?

DSM also mentioned:

'During the DSM revision process, Krueger consulted with pro-pedophile activist group B4U-Act, which campaigns to have pedophilia recognized as a sexual orientation and was co-founded by convicted child rapist Michael Melsheimer.'

There has been a concerted campaign to normalise fetishes and paraphilias and undermine sexual boundaries. Some of the people involved are unsavoury to say the least.

Nothing about this surprises me anymore.

It's so fucking obvious.

I know. What is most depressing is how people just shrug. The NHS hosted a link to a child porn site, ffs!.What would it take?!

In fact, as Nottingham NHS trans health Centre is still linking to WPATH' SoC 8, they are still directing people to a document that lists the Eunuch Archive as a reference!

Why are people not outraged?!

Apologies for overuse of the interrobang.

It's clear to see in this review of the WHO and UNESCO standards

These standards underpin the global initiative for Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), currently promoted by UNESCO’s ‘Foundation for Life and Love Campaignn_.’

safeschoolsallianceuk.net/2023/04/29/unesco-who-sexuality-education/

The table near the end has the easiest to access comparisons of previous and current standards and shows how boundaries have slowly been erased

Thanks, Warrior. I'll look into it.

Tbh, given the context, theres a strong argument that you’ve underused it

I just checked again.

WPATH SoC v 8 still linked.

ncth.nhs.uk/other-gp-guidance/