So, this group is not necessarily a group of women who actively organised women’s rallies. That is a shame. The message could have been very powerful but is more likely it is promoted by group who wish to define women for their own purposes.
No, sadly it seems to have been organised by a conservative Christian group with links to the evangelical movement in the US.
Their definition of woman is the old one that second-wave feminism initially rejected.
The big question is whether if it were a group of women organising that protest whether they would have been allowed to go ahead.
I get the impression that FF NZ are somewhat wealthy and connected and of course their definition of women is one that the powerful don't mind so much.