Which newspapers are most pro-trans agenda?

[BootsAndRoots]

Which newspapers (and online publications) are the most pro-trans? Or rather quite unbalanced in their reporting of such matters?

I wonder how many of them are part of a Stonewall scheme etc? And so have vested interests.

The reporting of the conversion therapy issue has been illuminating in how many papers have refused to acknowledge concerns raised by the EHRC for instance, and instead focus on religious groups.

The Guardian - unherd.com/2020/11/why-i-had-to-leave-the-guardian/

Who are simply not publishing articles which don't fit their narrative (woman being raped on a single sex hospital ward by a transwoman for example).

The Independent. Even worse than the Guardian and platform Twitter TRAs to write unhinged pieces.

I've particularly noticed that the Metro is very pro-trans, which is ironic because they are the sister paper of the Daily Mail (something they don't like people knowing about!).

Whenever I think about The Independent seemingly having no quality control over this I think about how it's owned by a mini Russian oligarch.

@BootsAndRoots

I've particularly noticed that the Metro is very pro-trans, which is ironic because they are the sister paper of the Daily Mail (something they don't like people knowing about!).

These papers mainly exist to sell advertising space and a parent company having lots of different brands to appeal to different demographics is a common strategy.

Remember when The Guardian did an article about Gary Dean Marie going on hunger strike because he wanted to be moved to a female prison and get back his make up and hair straighteners......but they completely omitted to mention that the reason he was in prison in the first place was because he was a paedophile who took and collected photos of underage girls and who broke in teenage girls bedrooms and videoed himself wanking whilst wearing their underwear.

That was when I decided The Guardian was just a complete shit rag. I remember just thinking I couldn't believe it! They did add it in in the end, but the original article did have his crimes in at all.

Also, coverage about the WiSpa incident being a 'hoax' from The Guardian, but when it turned out the bloke in question was actually a convicted sex offender, it all went rather quiet....

Apart from this ridiculously one sided article which focuses far more on 'trans rights' than the fact that a convicted sex offender was able, due to the insidiousness of gender ideology, to expose himself to women and young girls without censure - www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/02/person-charged-with-indecent-exposure-at-la-spa-after-viral-instagram-video