4w.pub/hkmansa/
The victim, 'Ms. X', believed she was meeting a lesbian, who described 'herself' as a tomboy.
She only realised her date was a man when he forcibly penetrated her.
The man has been cleared of rape, because the defence successfully argued that the victim " was not a lesbian but a bisexual due to a past relationship history with men, and therefore had no reason to feel "disgusted" or betrayed by Tsang's sexual advances, concluding that it was simply a "miscommunication. "'
So because the victim has consented to sex with men before, she's not allowed to refuse another?
This is absolutely vile. There are no words strong enough.
Do bear in mind that there's a push to decriminalise rape by deception over here 