Well, this is the thing, Isabel, the language is so confusing (deliberately so, I would say) that we can't be sure what she means, and I do wonder if she could spell it out herself.
I have frequently seen someone confidently state on Twitter that there are intersex people who have both male and female anatomy. I'm not a medic or a biologist but people who are have confirmed that this is utter nonsense. People with DSDs are all either female or male. There can be some difficult cases within that group, but their numbers are tiny compared to the population whose sexual development was as expected.
Emily could be one of the numpties who thinks there genuinely are hermaphrodites and they're as numerous as redheads (redheads where, as More or Less on R4 pointed out a while back - redheads in Scotland are very numerous, redheads in Sudan are vanishingly rare, so which is it?).
Or she could be trying to say that transmen are men, in spite of being female and in most cases not having their female reproductive system removed (fortunately - I don't want anybody going through except if absolutely necessary medically).
Or she could be under the impression that sexual reassignment surgery on a male body actually results in that male person having a cervix. (Of course, this would mean she was also labouring under the misapprehension that most transwomen have SRS, and we know only a small minority do.)
The only sure thing this sorry episode shows is that she hasn't done any solid research, her grasp of science is poor and she has no common sense. For all these reasons, she and the rest of the Labour Cabinet are even less fit to govern the UK than Johnson and his merry crew, and that's saying something.