Another example of why mixed sex facilities don't work for women

[Campervan69]

'used iPhone to film female colleague showering in cubicle' [[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9462725/Police-officer-used-iPhone-film-naked-female-colleague-showering-cubicle.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead]]

A male police officer used waterproof iPhone to secretly film his naked female colleague showering in next cubicle of unisex changing room, court hears.

Why can't we go back to single sex facilities? Mixed sex is so much worse for women.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9462725/Police-officer-used-iPhone-film-naked-female-colleague-showering-cubicle.html?ito=native_share_article-bottom

Sorry about crap link. Hope this works better.

Your link seems to be a bit misformatted.

'Unisex': designed for the requirements of the default, important type of humans. From t-shirts to changing rooms, is there anything 'unisex' which works better for women than for men?

Google any city in the world + the words "man toilets camera" and you'll probably find someone arrested for this. And that's just the ones that have a) been arrested and b) the press has actually picked it up.

It's a fucking pandemic.

Yeah but pervs gonna perv so let's make it even easier for them by giving them access to women and girls in unisex spaces for all!

This is why I don't want mixed-sex facilities. Men will use it to abuse women.
Female only spaces are vital for women's safety.

Sadly it being Gloucestershire Police this did not totally surprise me. Or if it had been Derbyshire Police or South Yorkshire Police.

I think it would be the same in any police force. Actually in any employment, anywhere in the country. The world is full of pervy men and many of them are opportunists.

And as a pp says, google unisex and camera and there are thousands of cases of this. Really depressing.

I was shocked that in a mixed sex shower facility there were gaps!

Why on earth were they designed like that? I mean it just doesn't make sense at all.