Another Female Sex Offender

[MightyMike]

Rachel Smith

I'm not saying this person with an Adams apple, high hair line and conviction for a crime 99% of the time is committed by a person with an XY chromosome is not female (and yes, I know females can be deviant and evil to).

But, how can I be sure they are female, how can I know that what is reported is factually correct if we are not allowed to state biological facts.

I know! I get The DailyGlinner email and just had exactly the same reaction!

I did think the mail was a bit more in the ball with this

The comments are always full of ‘ugly woman’ ‘women are just as bad’ posts and i sit there thinking ‘how are you unable to put two and two together’

I don't understand why editors who want to make it clear it's a man have the words woman and female in articles. Why not write: person, aged 56, ...
Most people would picture the correct sex of the perpetrator given the crimes listed. Surely that wouldn't break some publishing code of practice.

Personally I think this is a wilful mis-reading of the IPSO guidelines, which are fine with you printing a person's sex, but should only print other info if it's relevant.

This is just blatant false reporting, that person's sex is not female, and is therefore, in my opinion, against the guidelines.

If anyone sees those photos and don’t say “well it’s obvious that’s a fucking man” I would assume they were blind.

I mean good god!

And bore there’s a special place in hell reserved for you with those photos

I did think the mail was a bit more in the ball with this

They don't care, and they couldn't resist the "female sex offender with 50 previous convictions" angle.

And they've had training from Mermaids.

Its the female bit that gets me as well

Person A ...Can we all share the word woman?

Majority of the population...of course, we want to be nice and kind And we can still use male and female to differentiate when absolutely necessary

Person A....lovely, thank you...oh I’m taking female as well

Majority of the population....oh that’s no problem, means the same thing anyway

bore thanks for posting those 🤮
Seriously. Calling transwomen "female" is a new layer of obfuscation. Maybe this is the response to pushback on redefining woman. If we insist woman = adult human female, they will try to redefine female.

Trying to redefine "adult" too.

Could be worse, Rufus. I was eating when I scrolled down as far as that photo.

There's a small part of me that wonders if we should actually have a trigger warning before such photos, for the sake of us agp-survivors. But the larger part of me is distracted by a strengthening of my aversion to feminine-sexy coded stuff.

Could be they've described this individual as female because there's a GRC. If there isn't, it's a straight-up lie.

But the larger part of me is distracted by a strengthening of my aversion to feminine-sexy coded stuff.

Comment of the day.

(My similar feelings on this date as far back as that Kevin Rowland video.)

@RufustheSniggeringReindeer

Its the female bit that gets me as well

Person A ...Can we all share the word woman?

Majority of the population...of course, we want to be nice and kind And we can still use male and female to differentiate when absolutely necessary

Person A....lovely, thank you...oh I’m taking female as well

Majority of the population....oh that’s no problem, means the same thing anyway

That's a very good encapsulation of the language problem, rufus. Some of the transactivists are after 'biological female' too now, ffs.

Colonising everything.

One of the commwnts : Ridiculous. If it were a fella would have been locked up and rightly so

Haha. Brilliant.

Never heard of Kevin Rowland. I'm going to regret googling this, aren't I?

We need another legal challenge, around the ridiculous press reporting rules/guidelines that are the cause of this constant deception.

It is very much in the public interest to know the real sex of sex offenders, given how massively more likely males are to be in this category than females, and given the current moves to fully legitimise access for those males who wish it to spaces where females are vulnerable.

And of course it’s in the public interest generally to know when newspapers are blithely reporting outright lies, as the Mail has done here. Indefensible.

I can't do links but just google (image is enough!) his name and the word "dress".

Eye bleach needed!

I dare say certain quarters would dismiss us as prudes, but all I can think, when subjected to that sort of imagery, is: I am being forced into the role of gazing male, and it revolts me; and it's all for men's benefit, not ours.

Not sure about if it were a fella would have been locked up - I forget whether it was local or in the nationals but just yesterday I was reading about a convicted man-identifying male paedophile who'd been spared prison lest the poor wee flower caught covid in there; and then of course there's my own abuser, whom the judge believed could be rehabilitated of his tendency to rape preschoolers.

I would like to see a legal challenge too @TalkingtoLangClegintheDark

I'd like to see a debate, or petition on a new Proposed Equality Act crime reporting section:

e.g.

A person does not contravene section X, so far as relating to sex discrimination, by reporting crime for persons of each sex if—

(a)the limited provision is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim -

'legitimate aim' is that male sex crimes are reported accurately as it affects public policy etc etc*

I agree with find

I’m not much good at organising stuff...but I’m happy to be organised

There are too many comments along the lines of 'if this was a man he'd be treated differently'.

If this person really is male, is the paper suppressing that to push another agenda?

@NotTerfNorCis

There are too many comments along the lines of 'if this was a man he'd be treated differently'.

If this person really is male, is the paper suppressing that to push another agenda?

The whole MRA “women get treated so much better”, schtick? Men are the real victims?

Yes, that’s a thought.

That correlation between MRA and TRA really stands out sometimes, doesn’t it.

FindTheTruth, I’d like to see truthful reporting across the board, personally, whatever the subject matter is.

If a person is going to be defined at all then I think their biological sex should be a matter of record. But then, I think the GRA should be repealed altogether. Giving falsehoods legal status was one of the worse moves ever made by Parliament.

Interesting how none of the comments pointing out this person is not, in fact, female, have been allowed to stand.

The author of the piece goes by the first name of Faith.

I wonder what sex Faith is?