Guardian had to get it in somehow, didn't they...

[NeurotrashWarrior]

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/mar/08/andy-warhol-retrospective-tate-modern-then-he-was-a-she?CMP=fbgu&utmmmedium=Social&utmsource=Facebook#Echobox=1583678479

A piece about how Warhol ripped off Yayio Kusama might have been more appropriate on IWD.

Yes. Or how Duchamp wasn't the artist behind 'Urinal', but Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, in all probability.

www.theguardian.com/books/2019/mar/29/marcel-duchamp-fountain-women-art-history

Or - Ana Mendiata was in all probability killed by Carl Andre.

www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/ana-mendieta-11167

Or the newly discovered work by Gentileschi

www.artsy.net/news/artsy-editorial-discovered-artemisia-gentileschi-painting-view-london

Yep.

It's like - can't put it in women as we are trying to get our readership back, TRAs will be annoyed if it's in trans, lets get it in art and sprinkle it with female terms. And that'll gaslight the unsuspecting.