Aaronovitch in the Times about Maya's court case

[Igneococcus]

The law only seems to protect trendy beliefs, he says:

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/8c95dd3a-5e35-11ea-9891-dcb2edabd2b0?shareToken=bc62159b8129e92bbf25251456b5c0ff

Here’s a shareToken. www.thetimes.co.uk/article/8c95dd3a-5e35-11ea-9891-dcb2edabd2b0?shareToken=eab2bbc906074a607788b16101a5856c

Sorry Igneococcus, I’ve just realised your link already had one!

No worries empress
I like to make the most of me subscription

Thanks for sharing. An enjoyable read.

Jo Bartosch wrote a great thing this week about how the (male) naturists completely ignore the sex based differences of men and women being naked, and the objectification women experience. This is a great article but the author seems to do the same thing

"Indeed, given the two cases, you can’t help thinking that the real difference between Ms F and Mr C is that one is fashionable and the other is anything but."

The other difference is that Ms F is female and Mr C is male. Who knew?

Whoops. Forgot the link! medium.com/@josephinebartosch/naked-truths-141551f9ad4b

Great comments under the times article

I thought that too about the differences of men and women naturists and the treatment they get. and I wondered if Adamites included naked women as well as naked men in their worship.
But on the main point of the article he’s absolutely spot on. Very clear. Maya.

Wonderful article

I've made more than 1 comment but they are all pending approval.