Victoria Derbyshire this morning

[MaMaLa321]

I've been out all day. Was it worth watching or did they all just double down on TWAW?

www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000f998/victoria-derbyshire-labour-leader-special

A short segment discussing this beginning at 1:04 brings up the TWAW debate. RLB doubles down that TWAM and TMAM then waffles (distracts?) for a bit.

Most interesting is at 1:06:30 when VD asks RLB what (her) definition of a woman is. She replies "a definition of a woman is someone who identifies as a woman".

Most interesting is at 1:06:30 when VD asks RLB what (her) definition of a woman is. She replies "a definition of a woman is someone who identifies as a woman".

Does a single person actually believe this utter shite?

Surely the follow up question then is "How so you know what a woman is so that you know whether or not you identify as one?"

She replies "a definition of a woman is someone who identifies as a woman".

It is a really helpful way of showing who can't be arsed even trying to understand the debate. If that is as far as your thought process got, you are not even fit to be the leader of the joke that is the Labour party right now, let alone the rest of the country.

FFS, engage your brains.

"a definition of a woman is someone who identifies as a woman".

I hope it's been pointed out to her you can't define something in terms of itself. Well, not if you want it to actually mean anything.

I cannot for the life of me understand how a woman is spouting this nonsense.
Why?
What is their reasoning?

thanks for that bedelia
Lisa Nandy 'I can't discuss with people who don't think transwomen exist'
No. We know transwomen exist. We know they aren't women.
twat

I think it was RLB that when asked what her number 1 priority was said that she had loads. TBF, if you struggle with the concept of a numbered list maybe understanding that a definition should be useful is a bit much.

Oh dear, how did it come to this. 3 potential Labour leaders and not a viable brain cell between them.