Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Camilla Long in the Times

15 replies

Cismyfatarse1 · 28/07/2019 12:20

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/when-a-trans-woman-is-refused-a-brazilian-wax-the-issue-isnt-human-rights-its-balls-tljll2z6x?shareToken=094e25808a6c25f1acdc2e0ed1ce8355

Clear, well written. I thought people might enjoy reading it.

OP posts:
MadamBatty · 28/07/2019 12:43

Great to the point article. Great comments, 95% of commentators get it

youkiddingme · 28/07/2019 13:49

I love the strap line.

EmpressoftheMundane · 28/07/2019 14:35

It was witty, incisive and bang on.

I’m impressed that she was brave enough to write it. She didn’t tie herself in knots, or make lots of explanations and provisos that just confuse the message. She just talked openly and directly about it like any other topic. Bravo.

JuniLoolaPalooza · 28/07/2019 14:50

It is almost as if these activists don’t think they’re making progress unless a woman has been publicly attacked or lost her job.

I'd say she's been following a lot of this quite avidly.

JessicaWakefieldSV · 28/07/2019 15:07

My god I love it! Thanks for the share

AnotherAdultHumanFemale · 28/07/2019 15:27

Good article, it's so refreshing to see common sense in the media after months of bizarre gaslighting articles with a 'you're a bigot if you disagree with me' vibe or just plain old silence. I hope they keep exposing the ideology and that common sense prevails.

AnotherAdultHumanFemale · 28/07/2019 15:35

Also, the comments under the article are giving me life! Wow, so incredible to read such straight up truth and facts after so much pandering and lying.

Maybe we should create a thread to collect all the best, most hilarious and awesome responses to this nonsense in one thread for us to read when we are feeling in despair about it all?

TurboTeddy · 28/07/2019 15:38

No splinters in Camilla Longs arse. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Prawnofthepatriarchy · 28/07/2019 15:40

I've been very interested by the comments. Apart from one prolific poster no one seems to be supporting JY's case

SonicVersusGynaephobia · 28/07/2019 15:43

"What you’re doing is trying to humiliate women for being women while requesting they satisfy your disgusting fantasies. Because this isn’t about gender or sexuality, it is about male aggression. It is almost as if these activists don’t think they’re making progress unless a woman has been publicly attacked or lost her job."

This is great. Fantastic article.

AnotherAdultHumanFemale · 28/07/2019 15:44

This is my new favourite comment from that article:

"Here is a suggestion to break the left’s ridiculous gender ideology and denial of biological reality.

President Trump should make a declaration that he is identifying as a woman. The left will have to (1) admit the absurdity of their gender ideology or (2) accept and celebrate “Donna Trump” as the first woman President, thus beating (lists US female politicians) to the glorious goal of one of their “female firsts”.

Furthermore, if he remains married to Melania he will also be the first gay president, and the first lesbian president. He will also be the first lesbian president married to an immigrant! What a glorious event for the democrats to celebrate!"

FormerMediocreMale · 28/07/2019 16:52

Great article. Thank you again The Times.

nettie434 · 28/07/2019 18:44

Thanks cismyfatarse. Good article. The comments seem to be split between those familiar with the case who are glad it is finally being covered in the mainstream media and those who are finally realising what is happening. I love that line about not being happy unless someone’s job is threatened. Also saw a comment referring to your pronouns post barracker

Cismyfatarse1 · 28/07/2019 23:25

Love the comments.

OP posts:
teawamutu · 29/07/2019 10:48

Was esp interested to see the comments from the self - claimed transsexual. Started very self - deprecating and reasonable and 'people like this ruin it for us nice harmless ones'.

Further down is much more 'cite your sources' but not responding when given them, saying others are being ridiculous etc etc etc...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page