Please or to access all these features

Weaning

Find weaning advice from other Mumsnetters on our Weaning forum. Use our child development calendar for more information.

Lesser evil: ?FF or early solids

5 replies

Mummyfor3 · 06/08/2008 21:57

Here is the thing: I will have to return to work in 3 weeks time when DS will be 22 weeks old. He is currently exclusively BF although had a handful of bottles of FF in his life to allow his gran to look after him a few evenings.
I am rubbish at expressing, even with very good electric pump (2 weeks of daily efforts have resulted in 5 oz EBM in freezer ).
So, I was wondering, would I be better giving the childminder bottles of FF or get him to have lots of fruity solids and water during the day. I am planning on continuing to BF him when we are together. I work 10hrs days 3x/wk.
Any infant nutrition gurus out there who could offer advice? Thanks.

OP posts:
Mummyfor3 · 07/08/2008 09:47

Bumpitybump
Anybody??

OP posts:
EffiePerine · 07/08/2008 09:51

Not a guru but I would have said FF. I didn;t bother with DS, but went back to work a little later (6 months) and was OK with expressing, so different situation

alarkaspree · 07/08/2008 09:51

Neither is evil.

I think a 22 week old will need more nutrition than fruit and water over a 10-hour period during the day, so you will need to give formula.

2point4kids · 07/08/2008 09:51

Formula has to be better than to go all day with no milk at all and just solids at less than 6 months I'd say.

Early weaning can actually harm your baby. Formula is not 'evil' just an alternative method of milk feeding!

Mummyfor3 · 07/08/2008 10:51

I should have written "evil" - DSs 1 and 2 were mixfed so I really have nothing against FF .
Thanks for opinions, confirms my gut feeling (pun intended ) to give CM whatever I do manage to express and formula bottles for him.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page