I don’t think her being black is a reason why I dislike her. I would not put it past her to bring up the colour of her skin in an argument first though - playing the race card when convenient.
You are seriously going to give a lecture to others about racism when you have written that. You don't think her being black is the reason you dislike her? Why bring her up at all, she has absolutely nothing to do with this topic? Yet bring her up you have.
As I did not live in their environment I, as a white woman, would not dare tell a biracial woman that what she experienced
But you will do that to Diane Abbott, having not experienced her long life of service and being a high profile MP, if she brings up race as a reason for the criticism she receives.
William said they were not a racist family immediately after the programme aired. He did not deny any of the specific claims,
There were no specific claims to deny. Harry and Meghan could not even agree when the "conversation" happened. They certainly did not say who said whatever unspecified thing was said. Meghan was not part of the conversation. Harry said he didn't want to talk about it. They picked up an anti racism award based on nothing but a second hand, unspecified rumour from a woman with an axe to grind. And 18 months later, Harry denied that Meghan alleged any racism. The apparent racist conversation was not brought up in Spare or the Netflix documentary.
In addition it’s come to light that letters were exchanged by Meghan and Charles, so there was obviously hurt on Meghan’s side that was addressed by our HOS
Once again , rumour, via Omid Scobie, in a paraphrasing of a letter's apparent contents set out in a publication that has had to be pulped (Dutch Endgame). The only source for which letter is the Sussexes, hence the obvious conclusion that they absolutely leak private information to the press. What are the exact contents of that letter? You don't know because nobody does. And you have no idea what the motivation of the letter was, who started the correspondence and whether it has in fact been an exchange of correspondence back and forth or just a "set up" letter sent from Meghan in an attempt to set a trap - which imo is what her intention was in her letter to her father (as supported by her email exchanges with Jason Knauf).
I really don’t believe Catherine is racist but I question why she would bring up a child’s skin colour in the early stages of Harry’s relationship with Meghan.
On what basis do you believe this even happened? Where's your proof?
Cf my comments about Diane Abbott. Why did you bring up her skin colour?
What do you think about the following comments about skin colour?
- Harry on Stephen Colbert. Talking about how he worried his ginger genes would not be able to "stand up" to Meghan's genes - presumably he means her African American genes, since her father's genes are ginger and blue eyed. He then expressed his relief that his daughter took after him and not her. Do you think that is racist? To be relieved your daughter shows no signs of being black?
- Harry and Meghan on Netflix. Making a throw away, almost disdainful remark about Archie looking like Meghan (meaning, I assume, brown eyed and dark haired, olive skinned). But then waxing lyrical about Lily's looks and her blue, blue, blue eyes. What do you think Doria might think about their delight in her grand-daughter not looking anything like her? A bit of a micro aggression, perhaps?