Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Elton granted access to Levesondocs

3 replies

Mumsnut · 01/03/2024 12:02

...allowed to see private eye payment details

OP posts:
Mumsnut · 01/03/2024 12:10

This is for hacking claim against Daily mail

OP posts:
Nishky32 · 01/03/2024 14:15

I thought you meant payments to private eye magazine for a minute!

interesting development

Mumsnut · 01/03/2024 14:24

A very pragmatic decision. Don't know if there is anyone able to appeal it.

Here's an extract from the Telegraph article

"In a notice published last night, ministers approved a request from six high-profile figures to unseal documents submitted as part of the public inquiry into hacking more than a decade ago.
The documents outline payments made to private investigators by both the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday.
The notice, which was signed by Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer and Home Secretary James Cleverly, states that the ledger cards may be used by the claimants and their lawyers for the purposes of their claims.
Prince Harry and Sir Elton John are among a group of celebrities to have filed a lawsuit alleging widespread unlawful behaviour at Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail titles.
Actors Liz Hurley and Sadie Frost have also brought the claim, alongside former politician Simon Hughes and Doreen Lawrence, the campaigner and mother of Stephen Lawrence.
They have accused the newspaper group of phone hacking and other unlawful information gathering including placing listening devices in cars and recording private phone conversations dating back over three decades.
In a joint statement, Ms Frazer and Mr Cleverly said: “We do not consider that it is necessary in the public interest to withhold these documents from any disclosure or publication and have decided to vary the FRO [final restriction order] so as to allow the disclosure of these documents solely for the purposes of the proceedings.
“In this case, in our judgement, the public interest in promoting the just, speedy and economic resolution of the proceedings outweighs the countervailing public interests.”
They added that the decision made no comment on the merits of the legal claim, adding that this was a matter for the courts to determine.
The intervention by ministers will come as a major boost to the celebrities after a judge ruled in November that they could not use leaked copies of the ledgers in their case as they were supplied to the Leveson inquiry in confidence.
The notice varies a restriction order imposed by Sir Brian Leveson in 2012, meaning the documents can now be used.
Associated Newspapers, which has always denied the allegations, applied to have the claims dismissed partly on the basis that the documents were sealed. The company also argued that the claims were outside a time limit for legal action."

The ‘oddity’ in Prince Harry’s privacy claim against Daily Mail publisher

High Court judge says it is unusual the key witness in the case did not reveal he gave contradictory statements to both sides

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/03/30/prince-harry-legal-case-associated-newspapers-ltd-oddity/

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page