I shouldn’t be surprised and disappointed by the Times publishing such a smear story, but hey, they are owned by Murdoch, so there you go.
This is such a non-story. For those who don’t know, the Bin Laden family is very large, very rich and very well connected in Saudi Arabia. Their wealth largely comes from handling huge infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia.
Osama bin Laden was one of the family - the 17th of 53 children of the family patriarch (his father had multiple wives!). When he turned to fundamentalism in the 1990s the Bin laden family publicly disowned him, and he was stripped of his Saudi passport. There has never been any suggestion that his wider family had anything to do with his terrorist activities.
The Bin Laden family is known for philanthrophy - they have donated large amounts to Harvard to fund various Islamic studies. There is also a Bin Laden Visiting Fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies that the family have funded for 30 years or so.
So, a family that is known to donate monies to charities gives Prince Charles’ charity a donation that was accepted, scrutinised, and accepted by the charity’s trustees, not Prince Charles personally. 🤷♀️