(this will be hard): please - without looking at prices - which of these handbags do you like the best?

[VermiciousKnid]

one

two

three

lisalisa are you serious?

much cooler to have a topshop one anyway
it's just naff spending that on a bag

maybe you should try burberry

none

i would chose 1.

Then i looked at the prices went then thought i would still pick 1 because u can get the same bag as 3 for a fiver

2 not for me

1 - colour makes it look plasticy, it's okay in black

2 - yuck

3 - nicest imho

if you've got it, spend it!

No 1 in beige is yuk yuk yuk, if you do get it I would go for it in black.

However the one that looks the nicest of all three is no 3.

My best advice would be to keep looking, with the budget I am assuming you have there must be a nicer selection of bags around.

Its your money , you spend it on handbags if you want to!

just not on number two.....

I like the third one best.

2 is a nice colour though. but isn't ruching rather over?

I think they're all minging TBH!!!!

And the prices????? BIZARRE amount of money spend on something that carries yer purse, phone, tampons and (like most parents with very young kids) random bits of plastic toys!

But you wire in if you've got the cash to flaunt.

I liked 2 the best - didn't like the others at all, especially 3.

I would go for number three 1st.
Number one 2nd
Number three,don't like that one sorry.

thanks all

haven't found anything i love - will keep looking

lisalisa - how rude! i give to charity

and anyway - £1,000 for one person is a handbag, for another is a year's supply of cigarettes...

I'm not fussed on any of them tbh.

why do you want to know

i looked at all of them.

and i find them all hideous.

they look like carpet bags that poor homeless people used to carry all their gear in.

no.

the paddington bag is a bit over I think (no 3). it looks very 2006 to me (don't shoot me for sounding so poncey please )

the jimmy choo is OK, but I don't like the colour and I've never liked jimmy choo bags in the flesh - have you seen it in the flesh?

I don't like the marc jacobs - I don't know if the accessories designer has changed but the shoes this and last season have been AWFUL, embarrassingly awful, and I think the bags are unsuccessful too.

I'm sorry!
If it is any consolation I spent 4 days in NY last october trying to buy a bag - any bag - and failed. that has NEVER happened to me before. I think bags are just crap at the moment. Unless you go for a Tod's bag - there are some nice ones. eg this one, but in the tan colour . the quality and the leather etc are MUCH better than jimmy choo IMO

That should be number two last.

Marc Jacobs for me. I like the colour and it's quirky.

i think i hate women who talk abotu loving shoes n bags and refer to themeslves as"chochoholics"

Well, obviously not for me. I have a bag from Kew with biro scribble on it by dd. But of those three, it would be the Marc Jacobs, because I like green handbags for some reason. Really dislike the fleshtone of the Jimmy choo. Find it a bit creepy.

No 1 is the colour of an elastoplast or silly putty. Bleurgh.
No 3 - notkeen on the shame or the massive thing sticking out of the top.
No 2 - is my favourite, though looking at the responses here I think I'm seriously unfashionable

i agree...get a tod's, or a hogan or a miu miu. more unusual, less likely to see crap copies of them around too. the jc bags are often really 'structured', not 'slouchy' enough iyswim

Ha! That Tod's one is very, very similar to a really nice changing bag I got sent last year. It is the same one as Liv Tyler has.