Opinions on these everyday flats, please - a bit edgy or a bit sad???

[polyhymnia]

These:

[http://gb.geox.com/Charlene-Flat-Shoes/D34Y7K000BCC9999,en,pd.html?start=27&cgid=women-shoes-flats%26ballerinas]]

Was drawn to these in the shop but can't decide if the studs at the back are just what I want, or an uneasy compromise/too try-hard.

Views, please!

TIA.

Ahhh - link not right. This should be:

gb.geox.com/Charlene-Flat-Shoes/D34Y7K000BCC9999,en,pd.html?start=27&cgid=women-shoes-flats%26ballerinas

I like em.

I'm sorry but I don't like them. They are not my taste.
I don't like Geox tbh

Like em

Don't like, sorry. Love studs - but those are granny studs.

Mmm - that was my fear re studs, tbh.

1661 shoes!

You'll look 16 from behind wearing these, and 61 from the front!

What about these

gb.geox.com/Lola-Flat-Shoes/D93M4A08566C9999,en,pd.html?start=13&cgid=women-shoes-flats%26ballerinas

I don't like them, they seem too fussy and a bit of a confusion. Bow at front and studs at back. A kind of shoe version of a mullet.....

What about these as an alternative?

Eh, no. The first thing I thought off when looking at them was Per Una. And IMHO that's never good. I agree with the 1661 comment.

Am happy to go with what looks like the majority - as said, I had big doubts.

Some killer points here - specially the Per Una one ... Have never and will never purchase anything from that 'brand'.

I do like some Geox things and already have a pair of their plainer ballerinas, so did want something a bit different - but in a good way!

Haven't explored Other Stories yet, though heard of them - thanks for the suggestion and will browse all their shoes now.