Prize for the shortest ever item to be described as a dress

[vesela]

goes to Urban Outfitters.

The fact that she's got it hanging down more at the back doesn't disguise the fact that it's breaking the basic rule of dress-ness.

blimey, sod the description of a dress, who would pay £194 for that !

We have another contender

Oh yes

Not as fanjo-revealing as your link, but chilly nonetheless.

tethers - but that first one is a "tunique" whateverthehell a "tunique" is....

I don't care, she's got no pants on she'll catch her death. No pants = dress in my book

The chambray shirt dress isn't short!

Surely your Regina has to be covered for it to be a dress? I'm fairly sure if I wore that with just a pair of knickers I'd be arrested.

Starlight, I want to go to your parties

The second one tether links to looks like she is wearing her boyfriend's shirt (after a night of unbridled passion...)

The latter two links are somewhat akin to what one of the teachers at our local primary school wears. She looks ridiculous and completely unprofessional esp as she wears it with tights and high heels.

Any dress by French Connection. Most of their dresses barely cover my arse and if I were to bend over I would be arrested. Its a shame as some are quite nice and if they were a couple of inches longer I would most definatley buy.

I feel like a right tart now lol! The dress I have on today is shorter than that shirt dress -which I honestly don't think is short! Did you look at the other pictures of it? It only came a few inches above her knee!