Please or to access all these features

SN children

Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.

LGO crapness continues..........

84 replies

inappropriatelyemployed · 03/06/2013 10:39

Over the last two years, I have become well used to the sheer crapness of the LGO but this really takes the biscuit.

The LGO, through their lovely lawyers Browne Jacobson, have stated very clearly that the LGO believes, where the courts do not, that there is a difference in law between 'arranging' provision and 'delivering' it so that it is perfectly ok for children with SEN to be without provision for several months - not because the LA didn't have a therapist, or someone was ill, just as a matter of routine with no explanation sought for it.

Also, despite the fact that the SEN COP states at para 8.109 that LAs must ?arrange the special educational provision...from the date on which the statement is made?, the LGO says this doesn't really mean that and that although the duty is absolute, delay is fine.

Seriously.

Anyway, given this tosh, we decided to ask for a case review and make a formal complaint about the conduct of this matter before proceeding down the JR route. I have additional evidence, my MP has made a complaint himself about the way they dealt with his evidence and we have had three provisional views and two final decisions in this case over two years. It took them 18 months to find maladministration on the facts they had had before them all along.

So solicitor writes to their lawyers and asks for details about the time frame to do so. I ask for time to make submissions. This is agreed in writing.

Then, before we can do anything, cue a letter today closing my file today! Says basically, we know you are going to complain about the failing to arrange as you keep banging on about the Education Act, but we don't agree with you so we're closing your file. Fuck off!

WTF Angry Seriously, this is an Assistant Ombudsman. I am livid. What a fucking disgrace.

OP posts:
StarlightMcKenzie · 05/06/2013 08:13

It might take some time, but if you were to trawl through MN media requests you might find a contact there, or a contact who has contacts iyswim that could be interested!?

StarlightMcKenzie · 05/06/2013 08:14

And aren't most media contacts tweetable now?

dev9aug · 05/06/2013 08:18

what about John Harris at the Guardian... he should know a thing or two about SEN...Wink

StarlightMcKenzie · 05/06/2013 08:25

You need a very simply outline of what has happened.

LGO finds LA's reasonable to break law and gag mother of special needs child to prevent her from seeking justice.

Summat like that......

inappropriatelyemployed · 05/06/2013 12:09

Thanks. I have contacted John Harris before but never got a response.

Not sure how you actually contact people on twitter

OP posts:
inappropriatelyemployed · 05/06/2013 16:07

Solicitor written another letter threatening judicial review - what would I do if she didn't act pro bono?

MP confirms they never even acknowledged his letter sent three months ago directly to the Ombudsman.

What a waste of money they are.

OP posts:
StarlightMcKenzie · 05/06/2013 16:10

Yay for the solicitor.

So pleased she's continuing. Someone with integrity at last.

StarlightMcKenzie · 05/06/2013 16:11

I wouldn't take it personally that they aren't answering your letters then. Just assume that is what they do, if they are doing it to MPs too.

inappropriatelyemployed · 05/06/2013 16:26

I know. Call me old fashioned but when the head of a national organisation cannot even bother to acknowledge a letter sent from an MP, you have got to be thinking the place is out of control.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page