My ex-P and I have our DD 50% of the time each. We are generally civil, but I am aware secondary school will be a flashpoint and I am not sure I understand the process, despite trying to research it. If anyone has been involved in this sort of situation (as a parent or the authority that deals with it!), I'd really appreciate advice. Obviously, I hope we'll just manage to agree, but I'd like to know where I stand.
DD started primary before we split. Ex-P moved and is now 20 minutes' drive away (12 miles). However, ex-P's work is about 2 minutes' drive from DD's school, so she does not struggle to get DD to school and then to work at 9.
For secondary school obviously we are in different catchments. Schools are not highly subscribed and in my experience, generally, children get places where they apply. Of course one couldn't rely on that. (I can go into details about catchments and schools, but don't want to make the post too long!)
The long and short is, I am fairly sure ex-P will want DD to go to the school that's nearest her (5 mins drive as opposed to 10). The big bonus is DD would be able to walk there, in theory. It's not a good school; the GCSE results are well below local and national averages; it has no sixth form, and generally people don't have good things to say about it.
I would like DD to go to a school that is 10 mins drive from ex-P (15-20 from me, but there is usually a bus). It has good results and seems strong in the subjects DD enjoys; at least some of DD's friends will be going there.
If we couldn't agree, my understanding is the LEA does it? Is that right? And based on what? Googling seems to suggest it's things like who gets child benefit (her, as she's the bio mum and it seemed sensible at the time), where the child goes to school now (near me, as I didn't move) ... basically it's all very evenly split.
If you've got this far, thanks!