Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Would you choose an equal partner or a more generous provider?

34 replies

Sarahandjenny · 17/09/2026 00:29

I’m curious what other women would choose, especially those who have been in a similar position.
Option 1 is the stereotypical “nice guy”. He’s sensible, thoughtful, reliable and would genuinely want to be a very involved dad. I honestly think if we had children he’d probably do as much as me, if not more, and would see parenting as something we both do.
The downsides are that he can be quite moany and particular. He watches money closely, notices mess, and if I left a dish in the sink overnight he’d probably comment on it. He’s very “on it” with the house and finances. Sometimes that can feel a bit irritating or restrictive, but underneath it he means well and is dependable.
Option 2 is much more of the “bad boy” type. Historically he could be a real arsehole, although he has made progress and is considerably better than he used to be. He’s also generous financially and currently pays for basically everything at home.
However, the trade-off is that most of the domestic stuff falls to me — cooking, cleaning, hoovering, keeping things running etc. I work too and want to continue working, including if I have children. If I’m realistic, I suspect that if we had kids I would end up carrying most of the childcare and mental load as well.
So essentially one gives me more financial freedom but probably leaves me doing most of the home/kids side, whereas the other is more financially cautious and particular but would probably be a much more equal partner and hands-on dad.
If you were choosing someone to actually build a life and have children with, which setup would you choose?
And if you’ve chosen either type in real life, how did it work out once children, work, money and the boring day-to-day reality came into it?

OP posts:
ForTipsyFinch · 17/09/2026 11:17

Both sound awful. Are you a man or a journalist btw?

Thatsthebottomline · 17/09/2026 11:25

Franxi · 17/09/2026 06:18

Neither. You pick someone you love. Both sound rubbish. Moaning, verging on controlling, or pathetic, disrespectful, uninterested man child. It’s like asking if you want dog shit or cat shit. I am assuming these are hypothetical men, but if not, have a bit of self respect and pick someone at least half decent.

Dedine "half decent". What exactly does half decent look like ?

Dracolina · 17/09/2026 11:44

Sarahandjenny · 17/09/2026 00:29

I’m curious what other women would choose, especially those who have been in a similar position.
Option 1 is the stereotypical “nice guy”. He’s sensible, thoughtful, reliable and would genuinely want to be a very involved dad. I honestly think if we had children he’d probably do as much as me, if not more, and would see parenting as something we both do.
The downsides are that he can be quite moany and particular. He watches money closely, notices mess, and if I left a dish in the sink overnight he’d probably comment on it. He’s very “on it” with the house and finances. Sometimes that can feel a bit irritating or restrictive, but underneath it he means well and is dependable.
Option 2 is much more of the “bad boy” type. Historically he could be a real arsehole, although he has made progress and is considerably better than he used to be. He’s also generous financially and currently pays for basically everything at home.
However, the trade-off is that most of the domestic stuff falls to me — cooking, cleaning, hoovering, keeping things running etc. I work too and want to continue working, including if I have children. If I’m realistic, I suspect that if we had kids I would end up carrying most of the childcare and mental load as well.
So essentially one gives me more financial freedom but probably leaves me doing most of the home/kids side, whereas the other is more financially cautious and particular but would probably be a much more equal partner and hands-on dad.
If you were choosing someone to actually build a life and have children with, which setup would you choose?
And if you’ve chosen either type in real life, how did it work out once children, work, money and the boring day-to-day reality came into it?

If you were choosing someone to actually build a life and have children with, which setup would you choose?
Absolutely none of them. They're both terrible types of men to start a family with. You're going to struggle with either type of men.

I'd find someone else entirely. Someone who's a provider, a family man, dependable and doesn't believe in 50/50, but in more traditoinal gender roles.

Gobbledegoo · 17/09/2026 11:52

If you are truly asking neither is a good one. You need to be madly in love and that is all, unless they are controlling and love bombing.

blythet · 17/09/2026 11:54

BibbityBoppityTwo · 17/09/2026 00:31

Neither option sounds great to me.

Agree

blythet · 17/09/2026 11:55

You sound like you have experience of living with both of these men? What’s the set up?? Or is this a hypothetical question?

Cotopaxi · 17/09/2026 12:02

First post nails it. I wouldn't really want to have to choose between a nitpicking tightwad and a feckless 'bad boy' either.

MsPrufrockk · 17/09/2026 12:04

Sarahandjenny · 17/09/2026 00:32

Why’s that

You don't have to pick between bad choice A and bad choice B - there are actually men who aren't critical, lazy, selfish etc

Morecoffeeneedef · 17/09/2026 12:07

If I was dithering between two possible life partners I would think I didn't love either of them enough for a long-term commitments. If I did love one of them enough I would probably go ahead despite any number of red flags!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread