Forthe
Extremely patronising - I could definitely go off you if you continue in this vein.
You will notice that at no point do I ask you to prove that it is not an illness. I aks you not to represent an opinion on an unproven issue as fact.
I then go on to suggest that, AS A MODEL, the illness hypothesis is very useful because many alcoholics experience alcoholism as a mental illness i.e. it is a quirk in their mind where the normal standards do not apply. Is it an illness or is it not? It doesn't actually matter. What matters - given that it kills people - is that a given individual has an approach to it that helps him or her to overcome it. If he or she chooses to work on the basis that it is an illness that is, frankly, nothing to do with you and certainly does not need your ratification.
"I understant that you (M) may have go this notion from others who have not looked into how this disease notion came about. And possibly at a point when you felt vulneralbe about yourself." No - as I have explained elsewhere and at length, I find that it works for me conceptually. I do not care about its literal truth or otherwise - I care whether it fits my experience. It does, so I go with it.
Your faith or otherwise in the tutorial system is also of limited interest to me. It's just another model that works for me - if it doesn't work for you, try something else.