Me and DH moved to a lovely 4 bed detached a year ago. We LOVE the house and I think that actually made us lose sight of everything else when we bought it. We didn't think we'd ever be able to afford a house like this so we didn't properly consider the location. It's a nice location but we've realised it's not for us. It's too far out (10 miles out of town) with nowhere to really walk the dog or take the baby for a walk in the pram. I end up driving into town for everything, sometimes twice a day which seems a waste of petrol but I feel isolated otherwise. If we moved back into town we would have to downsize and buy something that needed doing up. We didn't have DD when we moved (she's only 4 months) so will eventually have to move back to get the schools we want. So our options are:
A - move now and give up our beautiful house but have the benefit of the better location
B - move in 2/3/4 years before DD starts school and make the most of living here, but still have to put up with living so far out.
We'll find it really hard to leave this house and move to something smaller and not as nice, but at the same time if we stay it's like we're in limbo when we'll have to do it eventually anyway.
So, which is the better option? I really can't decide.