Please or to access all these features

Politics

2 private donations of £36m each to one political party - is this the future of democracy in a world at the mercy of tech bros?

285 replies

IwantToRetire · 13/09/2026 01:38

Not particularly interested in discussing Reform. As anyone who wants to do that could set up a thread just like there is one about the Greens.

Of course the money could just be frittered away, but do these donations create an imbalance in terms of other parties having a voice, not just now, but when there is the next General Election.

For info (and there may be others) short bios about each man who has donated. Although, if as stated, they don't expect to decide party policy, maybe their personal history doesn't matter.

https://news.sky.com/story/ben-delo-and-christopher-harborne-who-are-reform-uks-two-mega-donors-13584792

Edited to add: I would ask this question if such donations had been made to any other Party, whether Labour, Tory, Greens etc..

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 13/09/2026 19:46

AwfulButTrue · 13/09/2026 18:59

You really think that if Labour themselves were the recipients of these donations they would have rejected them and be talking about making these changes??

I think there would be quite a push back from within the Party.

But then I am not under any illusion that any of the Parties are moral.

And the point is not which party, but the principle or single large donations from one source.

Or even should there be a limit.

Unless of course a Party was prepared to say thanks for the money when we get into office we will build more houses or something.

What is wrong with our political system that running a Party costs this amount of money.

OP posts:
Bunnyofhope · 13/09/2026 20:07

What is the point of being super rich if not to buy power?

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · 13/09/2026 20:33

Haha, Rayner talking about changing the rules on donations <and making them retrospective>.
They really are shameless.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 13/09/2026 20:43

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · 13/09/2026 20:33

Haha, Rayner talking about changing the rules on donations <and making them retrospective>.
They really are shameless.

Well Farage is always saying they're out to get him, it's not paranoia if they are.
By hook and by crook they're going to stop the revolution. 😂

NowSober · 14/09/2026 07:30

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · 13/09/2026 20:33

Haha, Rayner talking about changing the rules on donations <and making them retrospective>.
They really are shameless.

This is not news. The plan has always been for the changes to be retrospective. The date of 25 March 2026 is hard coded into the legislation currently having a second reading in the House of Lords.

MeNotYouJustMe · 14/09/2026 07:37

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 13/09/2026 20:43

Well Farage is always saying they're out to get him, it's not paranoia if they are.
By hook and by crook they're going to stop the revolution. 😂

Revolution???? 🤣

I love this idea that Farage and his cronies are going to sweep into power and work tirelessly for “the people”. They’re shameless fucking grifters who are out to line their own pockets. They’ll be no “revolution” 🙄.

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 09:06

Portakalkedi · 13/09/2026 11:44

Why is this seen as such a terrible thing because it's Reform? Surely the other parties have been given much more than this in the decades since they were formed, usually in return for favours, contracts, honours. Hardly news. Doesn't make it right but as with most things the rules should apply equally to all.

2m from Lord Sainsbury in recent years to Labour? There are only irrational debates to be had when it comes to Reform. It's like a rabid feeding frenzy I have never seen with any other party. I agree, rules applied and scrutinised equally or not at all.

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 09:46

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 09:06

2m from Lord Sainsbury in recent years to Labour? There are only irrational debates to be had when it comes to Reform. It's like a rabid feeding frenzy I have never seen with any other party. I agree, rules applied and scrutinised equally or not at all.

You mean like they will be when this legislation is passed.

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 09:51

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 09:46

You mean like they will be when this legislation is passed.

You mean if it's passed.

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 09:53

Those objecting to the 72m donation, are just because it’s not to Labour - otherwise you would not hear a peep.

If we are being honest.

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 09:55

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 09:53

Those objecting to the 72m donation, are just because it’s not to Labour - otherwise you would not hear a peep.

If we are being honest.

Of course. It is nothing but envy and the usual left not being able to recognise democracy.

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 09:58

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 09:53

Those objecting to the 72m donation, are just because it’s not to Labour - otherwise you would not hear a peep.

If we are being honest.

If we’re being honest it’s about the wealthiest people in the world not being able to help buy votes and thwart democracy. It would be wrong whichever party was the recipient of the money.

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 09:58

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 09:51

You mean if it's passed.

When.

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 10:01

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 09:58

If we’re being honest it’s about the wealthiest people in the world not being able to help buy votes and thwart democracy. It would be wrong whichever party was the recipient of the money.

The ‘fears’ for our democracy are fake.

Otherwise you would have criticised Starmer’s plans for the May local elections, or Labour’s continued attacks on free speech.

A democracy is not à la carte, sorry.

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 10:01

2 million pounds must be chicken feed nowadays then. Who would have thought it.

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 10:03

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 10:01

The ‘fears’ for our democracy are fake.

Otherwise you would have criticised Starmer’s plans for the May local elections, or Labour’s continued attacks on free speech.

A democracy is not à la carte, sorry.

They make it up as they go along. Like I said, Reform brings out the feeding frenzy.

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 10:05

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 10:03

They make it up as they go along. Like I said, Reform brings out the feeding frenzy.

There’s not even a pretence at being straight.

They don’t like a playing field being levelled - or they dont like it up em, as Kemi said, more eloquently.

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 10:08

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 10:01

The ‘fears’ for our democracy are fake.

Otherwise you would have criticised Starmer’s plans for the May local elections, or Labour’s continued attacks on free speech.

A democracy is not à la carte, sorry.

No they’re not. Despite all the protestations the richest people on the planet don’t give millions away without expecting something in return. You know this or you wouldn’t be constantly carping about Labour governments and union funding.

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 10:17

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 10:08

No they’re not. Despite all the protestations the richest people on the planet don’t give millions away without expecting something in return. You know this or you wouldn’t be constantly carping about Labour governments and union funding.

And the unions don’t want influence? Is that what you are asserting? Be clear, please.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 14/09/2026 10:42

MeNotYouJustMe · 14/09/2026 07:37

Revolution???? 🤣

I love this idea that Farage and his cronies are going to sweep into power and work tirelessly for “the people”. They’re shameless fucking grifters who are out to line their own pockets. They’ll be no “revolution” 🙄.

I love the smell of exploding Lefties in the morning. 😂

AwfulButTrue · 14/09/2026 10:49

BIossomtoes · 14/09/2026 09:58

If we’re being honest it’s about the wealthiest people in the world not being able to help buy votes and thwart democracy. It would be wrong whichever party was the recipient of the money.

Buying votes??

How is it buying votes?

If donating to a campaign is buying votes ALL donations must be stopped.

It is donating to help canvass and raise awareness to the party.

Unless that £72m is being split into £50 notes and being passed under the table at the ballot box that is a ridiculous statement.

LuckyHazelFox · 14/09/2026 10:55

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 14/09/2026 10:42

I love the smell of exploding Lefties in the morning. 😂

I wasn't going to read anymore of their hyperbole but that is some level of being triggered.

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · 14/09/2026 11:08

I have no idea if Burnham/Rayner are trying to make Farage a political martyr, but they're making a great fist of it.
The amount of persecution complex that Farage will be able to use as emotional leverage at the next GE is off the scale.
What about all the Reform voters in unions who have no say on the part of their subs that go to Labour?
And for consistency sake, if Dale Vince wanted to contribute £72m to Labour or The Greens, I'd say that was fine.

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 11:26

MarcTheGenderSkeptic · 14/09/2026 11:08

I have no idea if Burnham/Rayner are trying to make Farage a political martyr, but they're making a great fist of it.
The amount of persecution complex that Farage will be able to use as emotional leverage at the next GE is off the scale.
What about all the Reform voters in unions who have no say on the part of their subs that go to Labour?
And for consistency sake, if Dale Vince wanted to contribute £72m to Labour or The Greens, I'd say that was fine.

Edited

An excellent post.

This moment is fraught with risk for Labour.

Greyrock79 · 14/09/2026 11:27

AwfulButTrue · 14/09/2026 10:49

Buying votes??

How is it buying votes?

If donating to a campaign is buying votes ALL donations must be stopped.

It is donating to help canvass and raise awareness to the party.

Unless that £72m is being split into £50 notes and being passed under the table at the ballot box that is a ridiculous statement.

The PP has a habit of disappearing when cornered.

Swipe left for the next trending thread