Fellow Trumpites, huge announcemnet expected in the next few hours

[claig]

Trump has teased there will be a huge announcement at his rally in Ames, Iowa tonight. Special guest will be there.

Elites across the world are in panic, luvvies are having a lie down, Oxbridge is tuned in, PPES are petrified.

Will Palin endorse Trump? Is it game over for the Establishment?

No one knows. Elites are in meltdown and Trump fans are already doing the hokey-cokey.

Focusing on racism and identity politics is the only trick left in the Establishment's pocket. It is a tried and tested technique they use against any opposition to the EU e.g Farage.

They will try it against Trump but he is far more fearless than Farage and has defeated all of their tricks so far. The more the Establishment and its media attack him, the more the masses vote for Trump.

The Stump for Trump sisters are no mugs as can be seen in their videos and nor are the American people. Trump is going to win.

So, is it a good thing that he "dares to be politically correct", and to emphasise that, or a bad thing that keeps being brought up by the establishment?

Surely it can't be both?

Focusing on racism and identity politics

Yeah, which has pretty much always ended up sucking for those of us that are 'mixed'. We bear the brunt of the inevitable backlash but gain few of the benefits.

'So, is it a good thing that he "dares to be politically correct", and to emphasise that, or a bad thing that keeps being brought up by the establishment?'

It is a very good thing because of what it signifies. Trump has flipped the finger to the Establishment. He has said I will say what I like and the American Republican people support me. Puppets may try to ban him but that will only increase the American people's anger and they will start stumping for Trump just like the former registered Democrats, the Stump for Trump sisters, have done after they "ditched and switched".

By defying the Establishment's political correctness code of conduct, by breaking their Queensbury rules and taking the gloves off, he has signalled to the American people that I am going to take them on and beat them for you. I will bring your jobs back and build that wall and end those wars.

All the Establishment and their media worldwide can do is to call Trump a joke, a clown and a racist and try to ban him. But that cuts no ice with the American people.

Trump has said "the emperor has no clothes", he has said he is not politically correct and the American people are laughing. Now politically incorrect Sarah Palin has joined him. Together they are te elite's worst nightmare.

What it means is that Trump is serious and is going all the way and intends to take them down. He has mocked Bush and practically finished him off. He has brought Bill up and told Hillary to watch out if she tries to play any identity politics cards because he will tell the American public the full truth.

That means he is unstoppable and the Establishment are in meltdown.

'He did have Palin calling for their 'Warriors' to steam into the middle east last night.'

Yes to sort Isis out. These London DJ Jihadis who could be wiped out within weeks with the correct Commander in Chief as politically incorret Sarah Palin dared to say.

But why is it that mentioning his racism is good if it's by you, but mentioning it by his critics is bad?

Surely, his racism is a topic that should be addressed by supporters and opponents. You can't use it to proclaim how great he is and then shut people who accuse him of being racist.

And I use racism here as an example. It could be any of his other isms.

But Claig, as you've pointed out, ISIS is a creation of the CIA (as was al-Qaeda).

Trump is going all the way. They are used to puppets and phoney contests. this time they are up against Trump and this time it is real. The whole world knows it and the American people are laughing.

"Trump threatens to continue Clinton attacks over past allegations

Donald Trump has no qualms about attacking Hillary Clinton over past allegations of Bill Clinton's behavior.

"Well, I don't want to say it's a threat. But it is a threat," he told NBC's Chuck Todd on "Meet the Press" in an interview aired Sunday.

He added "it's fine" if his own personal history including his divorces is scrutinized during the presidential race.

The Republican front-runner has blasted the former president, calling him "an abuser" and highlighting allegations from Juanita Broaddrick saying Clinton had raped her, as Trump pushes back on the campaign trail against Democratic rival Hillary Clinton casting him as sexist."

edition.cnn.com/2016/01/10/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-personal-life/

Calling Trump a sexist won't work. Their best spin doctors are in trouble. Even the Oxbridge teenage whizzkids can't help them against Trump.

Of course, not just the CIA but also Saudi/Pakistani intelligence services amongst others.

Forget all that politics stuff.What I want to know is, WHERE IS MELANIA? Why isn't anyone else asking this? Is she under the patio at Mar-a-Lago?

So, should the US go to war or not? And to what purpose?

Should it go if it is in exchange for oil? For profit?

"Qadaffi is dead and gone. So what? We have spent more than $1 billion on the Libya operation. And what are we getting in return? A huge bill, that's what. It's incredible how foolish the Obama administration is. Libya has enormous oil reserves. When the so-called "rebels" came to NATO (which is really the U.S.) and asked for help to defeat Qadaffi, we should have said, "Sure, we don't like the guy either. We will help you take out Qadaffi. But in exchange, you give us 50 percent of your oil for the next twenty-five years to pay for our military support and to say thank you for the United States doing what you could never have done on your own." The "rebels" would have jumped at the offer and said yes.
Imagine the amount of oil we could have secured for America. Our policy should be: no oil, no military support.
Source: Time to Get Tough, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Dec 5, 2011"

www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Donald_Trump_Energy_+_Oil.htm

Or was it, after all, that Qadaffi should have stayed in power? But only because the US didn't get any oil out of it?

mimishimmi, there are different factions. No country is a monolith. America is the Roman Empire and just like in Ancient Rome there is all sorts of politics and factions vying for control.

Trump is for real and is the Establishment's worst nightmare. That is why this election is the most amazing in our lifetimes. Everybody's fate depends on the result. Puppets across the world are nsignificant, the battle is between billionaires in the most powerful country on the planet.

Trumpites are stumping for Trump.

How is he going to defeat ISIS? Carpet bomb them to fuck? Along with thousands of young and old innocent Syrians. If you do that you'll stop ISIS but there'll be a group that forms in the ashes of those innocent people. Every intervention spawns a grievance.

'But why is it that mentioning his racism is good if it's by you, but mentioning it by his critics is bad? '

I never said he was a racist. He isn't. It is the puppets and nobodies who debated in our Parliament who called him racist. I disagree with them. The Stump for Trump sistsers are black and they love The Donald just like millions of white people and Hispanics and the Puerto Rican singer of the vdeo posted earlier do.

'WHERE IS MELANIA?'

She was interviewed on TV. Trump brings the entire family out quite a bit, but it is the Donald J Trump show.

Trump is for real

Darling, Trump is not for real. He is full of soundbites to shock and awe and get all the rednecks and gullible people on board.

I never said he was a racist.

No, just delightfully non-politically correct.

'So, should the US go to war or not? And to what purpose? '

To wipe Isis out yes, but not to help the Saudis and Qataris and Turks who are backing the Jihadis and even Isis sometimes.

In order to end the destabilisation of the Middle East, the Isis terrorist attacks in the US and Europe and the suffering of Syrian people so that the millions of refugees can return home.

'Our policy should be: no oil, no military support.
Source: Time to Get Tough, by Donald Trump, p.102 , Dec 5, 2011"

Absolutely. America has a 19 trillion dollar deficit. They need to be paid for helping to support regimes. Concessions on oil are a part payment for military protection.

'How is he going to defeat ISIS? Carpet bomb them to fuck?'

No, that was Ted Cruz's solution.

It will need ground troops to go in and hunt them down. Palin and Trump will sort it out and the best US generals will get the job done.

'No, just delightfully non-politically correct.'

Absolutely. That is what real conservatives all over the world love about him. He dares to say "global warming is bullshit" despite the shock of the nobodies in Parliaments as they hold hands aloft and sing kumbaya in unison.

Vietnam.

'Vietnam'

You can't comapre the Vietnamese people who fought heroically to the London DJ Jihadi rappers and the ragbag mercenary Jihadis.

Isis would be wiped out in weeks and after that their backers and funders could be arrested.

Troops wipe out ISIS. Another group pops up. Al Shabab. The Taliban. The remnants of Al Queda. It's a hydra.

I dont watch tv claig

I only read the guardian to get my news and if i see something posted on Fb i research it. :)

Trump is a racist numpty with too much money and not enough sense.
He sees the world divided and wants to make it moreso. We should be working to make it less divided.

Trump would stamp out everything that wasn't blonde and didnt have money if he had his way.

Sometimes it sounds like he doesn't even understand what he is saying.

A good look at his tweets tells you what an idiot of a man he is. He us everything America shouldn't be, and should work against getting rid of. His attitudes live in the past. But all too sadly, commonly in the hearts of many Americans.

This thread is the most delightful demonstration of Poe's law I've ever encountered!

So this is satire, right? We had a team dinner tonight and debated this question for 30 minutes. We're split 5/3 in favour of bonkers - I still vote satire, though.

Anyone care to fill me in so I can settle this dispute during tomorrow's coffee break?

Either way, this is fucking hilarious!