Maybe this should be a new thread, but wondered if I could have your thoughts on a similar topic. Please be kind.
I had an "inconclusive" diagnosis from a Right to choose NHS adhd assessment in April this year. I'm 44.
For context, in my non medical professional opinion, the assessor could just have had a bad day. The long and short of it, I did not have a full assessment.
Being neurodivergent, I clammed up and during the session, but the person conducting was not in anyway helpful. They did not allow me time to think about answers and moved on as soon as I paused, leading me to think that short answers were all that was required. They gave me answers that my partner had submitted confidentially and also told me twice during the session that they would have to "check with the consultant" leading me to wonder why, if they didn't know, they were qualified to assess. There is more to it than this, but you can see I'm beginning to ramble and no one needs that.
What I'm asking, is if anyone has had a similar inconclusive diagnosis and what they did about it?
I am not in doubt about being neurodivergent, a diagnosis is a formality that will help me in a professional context.
Based on the right to choose (non) assessment, I did go back to gp who referred me for a second time. NHS came back to say I could not have another one. I totally get this, if I had in fact had a full assessment, but I had not.
I am on a waiting list for a private assessment, but I'm yet to source the fee so may have to cancel.
Thanks in advance.